Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Encyclopedia:Historical archive/Policy/Approval mechanism
(section)
Project page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== ChrisG proposal === main article: [[User:ChrisG/Approval_mechanism]] This is a suggested approval mechanism to meet the need to make Wikipeda a more reliable source and to support [[User:Jimbo_Wales/Pushing_To_1.0|Wikipedia 1.0]]. It is a twist on the namespace workflow mechanism suggested by Magnus Manske [[Wikipedia:Approval_mechanism#Magnus_Manske.27s_proposal|here]]. It is a process firmly based on wiki principles. It is flexible because decisions about quality are based on human judgment that each article meets the minimum standards for approval for Wikipedia 1.0. If it is agreed that standards should be raised then humans can amend their judgment appropriately during approval debates for more modern versions. '''Aims''' The design aims to: * Have no effect on the wiki process for creating and developing articles. * No fork within Wikipedia * Identify specific versions of articles as being stable and hence give the reader the comfort that the flagged version has been reviewed as meeting certain minimum standards. * Identify specific versions of articles as suitable for Wikipedia 1.0. * The process needs to be scaleable. It needs to be able to approve a large percentage of Wikipedia within 3-6 months. * Mark versions of each article appropriately depending on the outcome of any approval process for that version. This gives a guide to quality of particular versions in the history. * Be simple to understand. * Be easy to manage. * Be democratic. * Avoid requiring any exclusive, 'expert' clubs. * Be relatively simple to code. * Difficult to game. * Evolutionary approach rather than fundamental change in Wikipedia process. * Be acceptable to the majority of Wikipedians. '''Overview of the process''' The process makes use of namespaces to create a workflow process. A copy of the recommended version of an article is moved through the system, with an attached discussion page and votes. The process is best illustrated visually: [[Image:SuggestedWikipedia1.0process.png]]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Encyclopedia:Historical archive/Policy/Approval mechanism
(section)
Add topic