Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Scanning electron microscope
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Photometric 3D SEM reconstruction from a four-quadrant detector by "shape from shading"=== This method typically uses a four-quadrant BSE detector (alternatively for one manufacturer, a 3-segment detector). The microscope produces four images of the same specimen at the same time, so no tilt of the sample is required. The method gives metrological 3D dimensions as far as the slope of the specimen remains reasonable.<ref name="Mignot-2018"/> Most SEM manufacturers now (2018) offer such a built-in or optional four-quadrant BSE detector, together with proprietary software to calculate a 3D image in real time.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Butterfield|first1=Nicholas|last2=Rowe|first2=Penny M.|last3=Stewart|first3=Emily|last4=Roesel|first4=David|last5=Neshyba|first5=Steven|title=Quantitative three-dimensional ice roughness from scanning electron microscopy|journal=Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres|date=16 March 2017|volume=122|issue=5|pages=3023β3025|doi=10.1002/2016JD026094|ref=Butterfield2017|bibcode=2017JGRD..122.3023B|doi-access=free}}</ref> Other approaches use more sophisticated (and sometimes GPU-intensive) methods like the [[optimal estimation]] algorithm and offer much better results<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Butterfield|first1=Nicholas|last2=Rowe|first2=Penny M.|last3=Stewart|first3=Emily|last4=Roesel|first4=David|last5=Neshyba|first5=Steven|title=Quantitative three-dimensional ice roughness from scanning electron microscopy|journal=Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres|date=16 March 2017|volume=122|issue=5|pages=3025β3041|doi=10.1002/2016JD026094|ref=Butterfield2017|bibcode=2017JGRD..122.3023B|doi-access=free}}</ref> at the cost of high demands on computing power. In all instances, this approach works by integration of the slope, so vertical slopes and overhangs are ignored; for instance, if an entire sphere lies on a flat, little more than the upper hemisphere is seen emerging above the flat, resulting in wrong altitude of the sphere apex. The prominence of this effect depends on the angle of the BSE detectors with respect to the sample, but these detectors are usually situated around (and close to) the electron beam, so this effect is very common.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Scanning electron microscope
(section)
Add topic