Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Protein folding
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Modeling of protein folding === [[File:ACBP MSM from Folding@home.tiff|right|thumb|350px|Folding@home uses [[Markov state model]]s, like the one diagrammed here, to model the possible shapes and folding pathways a protein can take as it condenses from its initial randomly coiled state (left) into its native 3D structure (right).]] ''[[wiktionary:de novo|De novo]]'' or ''[[ab initio]]'' techniques for computational [[protein structure prediction]] can be used for simulating various aspects of protein folding. [[Molecular dynamics]] (MD) was used in simulations of protein folding and dynamics [[in silico]].<ref name="Rizzuti">{{cite journal | vauthors = Rizzuti B, Daggett V | title = Using simulations to provide the framework for experimental protein folding studies | journal = Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics | volume = 531 | issue = 1β2 | pages = 128β35 | date = March 2013 | pmid = 23266569 | pmc = 4084838 | doi = 10.1016/j.abb.2012.12.015 }}</ref> First equilibrium folding simulations were done using implicit solvent model and [[umbrella sampling]].<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Schaefer M, Bartels C, Karplus M | title = Solution conformations and thermodynamics of structured peptides: molecular dynamics simulation with an implicit solvation model | journal = Journal of Molecular Biology | volume = 284 | issue = 3 | pages = 835β48 | date = December 1998 | pmid = 9826519 | doi = 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2172 }}</ref> Because of computational cost, ab initio MD folding simulations with explicit water are limited to peptides and small proteins.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/d.jones/t42morph.html | title = Fragment-based Protein Folding Simulations | first = David | last = Jones | name-list-style = vanc | publisher = University College London }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.biomolecular-modeling.com/Abalone/Protein-folding.html | title = Protein folding | format = by Molecular Dynamics }}</ref> MD simulations of larger proteins remain restricted to dynamics of the experimental structure or its high-temperature unfolding. Long-time folding processes (beyond about 1 millisecond), like folding of larger proteins (>150 residues) can be accessed using [[Coarse-grained modeling|coarse-grained models]].<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Kmiecik S, Gront D, Kolinski M, Wieteska L, Dawid AE, Kolinski A | title = Coarse-Grained Protein Models and Their Applications | journal = Chemical Reviews | volume = 116 | issue = 14 | pages = 7898β936 | date = July 2016 | pmid = 27333362 | doi = 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00163 | doi-access = free }}</ref><ref name="Kmiecik">{{cite journal | vauthors = Kmiecik S, Kolinski A | title = Characterization of protein-folding pathways by reduced-space modeling | journal = Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | volume = 104 | issue = 30 | pages = 12330β5 | date = July 2007 | pmid = 17636132 | pmc = 1941469 | doi = 10.1073/pnas.0702265104 | bibcode = 2007PNAS..10412330K | doi-access = free }}</ref><ref name="teritfix">{{cite journal | vauthors = Adhikari AN, Freed KF, Sosnick TR | title = De novo prediction of protein folding pathways and structure using the principle of sequential stabilization | journal = Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | volume = 109 | issue = 43 | pages = 17442β7 | date = October 2012 | pmid = 23045636 | pmc = 3491489 | doi = 10.1073/pnas.1209000109 | bibcode = 2012PNAS..10917442A | doi-access = free }}</ref> Several large-scale computational projects, such as [[Rosetta@home]],<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/|title=Rosetta@home|website=boinc.bakerlab.org|accessdate=14 March 2023}}</ref> [[Folding@home]]<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://foldingathome.org/about-2/the-foldinghome-consortium/|title=The Folding@home Consortium (FAHC) β Folding@home|accessdate=14 March 2023}}</ref> and [[Foldit]],<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://fold.it/portal/info/science|title=Foldit|website=fold.it|accessdate=14 March 2023}}</ref> target protein folding. Long continuous-trajectory simulations have been performed on [[Anton (computer)|Anton]], a massively parallel supercomputer designed and built around custom [[ASIC]]s and interconnects by [[D. E. Shaw Research]]. The longest published result of a simulation performed using Anton as of 2011 was a 2.936 millisecond simulation of NTL9 at 355 K.<ref name="pmid22034434">{{cite journal | vauthors = Lindorff-Larsen K, Piana S, Dror RO, Shaw DE | title = How fast-folding proteins fold | journal = Science | volume = 334 | issue = 6055 | pages = 517β20 | date = October 2011 | pmid = 22034434 | doi = 10.1126/science.1208351 | bibcode = 2011Sci...334..517L | s2cid = 27988268 }}</ref> Such simulations are currently able to unfold and refold small proteins (<150 amino acids residues) in equilibrium and predict how mutations affect folding kinetics and stability. <ref name="pmid20974152">{{cite journal | vauthors = Piana S, Piana S, Sarkar K, Lindorff-Larsen K, Guo M, Gruebele M, Shaw DE | title = Computational Design and Experimental Testing of the Fastest-Folding Ξ²-Sheet Protein | journal = J. Mol. Biol. | volume = 405 | pages = 43β48 | date = 2010 | issue = 1 | doi = 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.10.023 | pmid = 20974152 }}</ref> In 2020 a team of researchers that used [[AlphaFold]], an [[artificial intelligence]] (AI) protein structure prediction program developed by [[DeepMind]] placed first in [[CASP]], a long-standing structure prediction contest.<ref name=cnbc20201130>{{Cite news |last=Shead|first=Sam |date=2020-11-30 |title=DeepMind solves 50-year-old 'grand challenge' with protein folding A.I. |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/30/deepmind-solves-protein-folding-grand-challenge-with-alphafold-ai.html |access-date=2020-11-30|website=CNBC|language=en}}</ref> The team achieved a level of accuracy much higher than any other group.<ref name="Stoddart">{{cite journal |last1=Stoddart |first1=Charlotte |title=Structural biology: How proteins got their close-up |journal=Knowable Magazine |date=1 March 2022 |doi=10.1146/knowable-022822-1|s2cid=247206999 |doi-access=free |url=https://knowablemagazine.org/article/living-world/2022/structural-biology-how-proteins-got-their-closeup |access-date=25 March 2022}}</ref> It scored above 90% for around two-thirds of the proteins in CASP's [[Global distance test|global distance test (GDT)]], a test that measures the degree of similarity between the structure predicted by a computational program, and the empirical structure determined experimentally in a lab. A score of 100 is considered a complete match, within the distance cutoff used for calculating GDT.<ref name=science20201130>Robert F. Service, [https://www.science.org/content/article/game-has-changed-ai-triumphs-solving-protein-structures 'The game has changed.' AI triumphs at solving protein structures], ''[[Science (magazine)|Science]]'', 30 November 2020</ref> AlphaFold's protein structure prediction results at CASP were described as "transformational" and "astounding".<ref name=Callaway2020>{{cite journal |last1=Callaway |first1=Ewen |title='It will change everything': DeepMind's AI makes gigantic leap in solving protein structures |journal=Nature |date=30 November 2020 |volume=588 |issue=7837 |pages=203β204 |doi=10.1038/d41586-020-03348-4 |pmid=33257889 |bibcode=2020Natur.588..203C |s2cid=227243204 }}</ref><ref>{{cite tweet|user=MoAlQuraishi|number=1333383634649313280|title=CASP14 #s just came out and they're astounding}}</ref> Some researchers noted that the accuracy is not high enough for a third of its predictions, and that it does not reveal the physical mechanism of protein folding for the [[protein folding problem]] to be considered solved.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.chemistryworld.com/opinion/behind-the-screens-of-alphafold/4012867.article |title=Behind the screens of AlphaFold |first= Phillip |last= Balls|date=9 December 2020|work=Chemistry World }}</ref> Nevertheless, it is considered a significant achievement in [[computational biology]]<ref name=science20201130/> and great progress towards a decades-old grand challenge of biology, predicting the structure of proteins.<ref name=Callaway2020/>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Protein folding
(section)
Add topic