Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Model theory
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Selected applications== Among the early successes of model theory are Tarski's proofs of quantifier elimination for various algebraically interesting classes, such as the [[real closed field]]s, [[Boolean algebra (structure)|Boolean algebras]] and [[algebraically closed field]]s of a given [[characteristic (algebra)|characteristic]]. Quantifier elimination allowed Tarski to show that the first-order theories of real-closed and algebraically closed fields as well as the first-order theory of Boolean algebras are decidable, classify the Boolean algebras up to elementary equivalence and show that the theories of real-closed fields and algebraically closed fields of a given characteristic are unique. Furthermore, quantifier elimination provided a precise description of definable relations on algebraically closed fields as [[algebraic varieties]] and of the definable relations on real-closed fields as [[semialgebraic sets]]{{sfn|Hodges|1993|pp=68-69}}<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Doner|first1=John|last2=Hodges|first2=Wilfrid|date=March 1988|title=Alfred Tarski and Decidable Theories|url=http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2274425|journal=The Journal of Symbolic Logic|volume=53|issue=1|pages=20|doi=10.2307/2274425|jstor=2274425|issn=0022-4812}}</ref> In the 1960s, the introduction of the [[ultraproduct]] construction led to new applications in algebra. This includes [[James Ax|Ax's]] work on [[pseudofinite field]]s, proving that the theory of finite fields is decidable,<ref>{{Citation|last=Eklof|first=Paul C.|title=Ultraproducts for Algebraists|date=1977|url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0049-237x(08)71099-1|work=HANDBOOK OF MATHEMATICAL LOGIC|series=Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics|volume=90|pages=105–137|publisher=Elsevier|doi=10.1016/s0049-237x(08)71099-1|isbn=9780444863881|access-date=2022-01-23}}</ref> and Ax and [[Simon B. Kochen|Kochen]]'s proof of as special case of Artin's conjecture on diophantine equations, the [[Ax–Kochen theorem]].<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Ax|first1=James|last2=Kochen|first2=Simon|date=1965|title=Diophantine Problems Over Local Fields: I. |journal=American Journal of Mathematics|volume=87|issue=3 |pages=605–630|doi=10.2307/2373065 |jstor=2373065 }}</ref> The ultraproduct construction also led to [[Abraham Robinson]]'s development of [[nonstandard analysis]], which aims to provide a rigorous calculus of [[infinitesimals]].<ref>{{Citation|last1=Cherlin|first1=Greg|title=Ultrafilters and Ultraproducts in Non-Standard Analysis|date=1972|url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0049-237x(08)71563-5|work=Contributions to Non-Standard Analysis|pages=261–279|publisher=Elsevier|access-date=2022-01-23|last2=Hirschfeld|first2=Joram|series=Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics|volume=69|doi=10.1016/s0049-237x(08)71563-5|isbn=9780720420654}}</ref> More recently, the connection between stability and the geometry of definable sets led to several applications from algebraic and diophantine geometry, including [[Ehud Hrushovski]]'s 1996 proof of the geometric [[Mordell–Lang conjecture]] in all characteristics<ref>Ehud Hrushovski, The Mordell-Lang Conjecture for Function Fields. [[Journal of the American Mathematical Society]] 9:3 (1996), pp. 667-690.</ref> In 2001, similar methods were used to prove a generalisation of the Manin-Mumford conjecture. In 2011, [[Jonathan Pila]] applied techniques around [[O-minimal theory|o-minimality]] to prove the [[André–Oort conjecture]] for products of Modular curves.<ref>{{cite journal|first=Jonathan|last=Pila|title=O-minimality and the André–Oort conjecture for ''C''<sup>''n''</sup>. |journal=[[Annals of Mathematics]] |volume=173|issue=3 |year=2011| pages=1779–1840| doi=10.4007/annals.2011.173.3.11}}</ref> In a separate strand of inquiries that also grew around stable theories, Laskowski showed in 1992 that [[NIP (model theory)|NIP theories]] describe exactly those definable classes that are [[Probably approximately correct learning|PAC-learnable]] in machine learning theory. This has led to several interactions between these separate areas. In 2018, the correspondence was extended as Hunter and Chase showed that stable theories correspond to [[Online machine learning|online learnable classes]].<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=CHASE|first1=HUNTER|last2=FREITAG|first2=JAMES|title=Model Theory and Machine Learning|date=2019-02-15|url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/bsl.2018.71|journal=The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic|volume=25|issue=3|pages=319–332|doi=10.1017/bsl.2018.71|arxiv=1801.06566|s2cid=119689419|issn=1079-8986}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Model theory
(section)
Add topic