Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Set (mathematics)
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Zorn's lemma === {{main|Zorn's lemma}} Zorn's lemma is an assertion that is equivalent to the axiom of choice under the other axioms of set theory, and is easier to use in usual mathematics. Let {{tmath|S}} be a partial ordered set. A [[chain (order theory)|chain]] in {{tmath|S}} is a subset that is [[total order|totally ordered]] under the induced order. Zorn's lemma states that, if every chain in {{tmath|S}} has an [[upper bound]] in {{tmath|S}}, then {{tmath|S}} has (at least) a [[maximal element]], that is, an element that is not smaller than another element of {{tmath|S}}. In most uses of Zorn's lemma, {{tmath|S}} is a set of sets, the order is set inclusion, and the upperbound of a chain is taken as the union of its members. An example of use of Zorn's lemma, is the proof that every [[vector space]] has a [[Hamel basis|basis]]. Here the elements of {{tmath|S}} are [[linearly independent]] subsets of the vector space. The union of a chain of elements of {{tmath|S}} is linearly independent, since an infinite set is linearly independent if and only if each finite subset is, and every finite subset of the union of a chain must be included in a member of the chain. So, there exist a maximal linearly independent set. This linearly independant set must span the vector space because of maximality, and is therefore a basis. Another classical use of Zorn's lemma is the proof that every proper [[ideal (ring theory)|ideal]]{{mdash}}that is, an ideal that is not the whole ring{{mdash}}of a [[ring (mathematics)|ring]] is contained in a [[maximal ideal]]. Here, {{tmath|S}} is the set of the proper ideals containing the given ideal. The union of chain of ideals is an ideal, since the axioms of an ideal involve a finite number of elements. The union of a chain of proper ideals is a proper ideal, since otherwise {{tmath|1}} would belong to the union, and this implies that it would belong to a member of the chain.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Set (mathematics)
(section)
Add topic