Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Quadratic reciprocity
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Connection with cyclotomic fields== The early proofs of quadratic reciprocity are relatively unilluminating. The situation changed when Gauss used [[Gauss sum]]s to show that [[quadratic field]]s are subfields of [[cyclotomic field]]s, and implicitly deduced quadratic reciprocity from a reciprocity theorem for cyclotomic fields. His proof was cast in modern form by later algebraic number theorists. This proof served as a template for [[class field theory]], which can be viewed as a vast generalization of quadratic reciprocity. [[Robert Langlands]] formulated the [[Langlands program]], which gives a conjectural vast generalization of class field theory. He wrote:<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.math.duke.edu/langlands/Three.pdf |title=Archived copy |access-date=June 27, 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20120122104607/http://www.math.duke.edu/langlands/Three.pdf |archive-date=January 22, 2012 }}</ref> :''I confess that, as a student unaware of the history of the subject and unaware of the connection with cyclotomy, I did not find the law or its so-called elementary proofs appealing. I suppose, although I would not have (and could not have) expressed myself in this way that I saw it as little more than a mathematical curiosity, fit more for amateurs than for the attention of the serious mathematician that I then hoped to become. It was only in Hermann Weyl's book on the algebraic theory of numbers<ref>{{Cite book |isbn = 0691059179|title = Algebraic Theory of Numbers|last1 = Weyl|first1 = Hermann|year = 1998| publisher=Princeton University Press }}</ref> that I appreciated it as anything more.''
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Quadratic reciprocity
(section)
Add topic