Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Broken windows theory
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Popular press=== In ''[[More Guns, Less Crime]]'' (2000), [[economist]] [[John Lott (political activist)|John Lott, Jr.]] examined the use of the broken windows approach as well as community- and [[problem-oriented policing]] programs in cities over 10,000 in population, over two decades. He found that the impacts of these policing policies were inconsistent across different types of crime. Lott's book has been [[More Guns, Less Crime#Opposition|subject to criticism]], while [[More Guns, Less Crime#Support|other groups support]] Lott's conclusions. In the 2005 book ''[[Freakonomics]]'', coauthors [[Steven D. Levitt]] and [[Stephen J. Dubner]] confirm and question the notion that the broken windows theory was responsible for New York's drop in crime, saying "the pool of potential criminals had dramatically shrunk". Levitt had in the ''[[Quarterly Journal of Economics]]'' attributed that possibility to the legalization of abortion with ''[[Roe v. Wade]]'', which correlated with a decrease, one generation later, in the number of delinquents in the population at large.<ref name=DonohueLevitt2001>{{Cite journal |doi=10.1162/00335530151144050 |title=The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime |journal=The Quarterly Journal of Economics |volume=116 |issue=2 |pages=379β420 |year=2001 |last1=Donohue |first1=J. J. |last2=Levitt |first2=S. D. |url=http://pricetheory.uchicago.edu/levitt/Papers/DonohueLevittTheImpactOfLegalized2001.pdf |ssrn=174508 |access-date=2012-06-04 |archive-date=2012-06-07 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120607014923/http://pricetheory.uchicago.edu/levitt/Papers/DonohueLevittTheImpactOfLegalized2001.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> In his 2012 book ''Uncontrolled: The Surprising Payoff of Trial-and-Error for Business, Politics, and Society'', [[Jim Manzi]] writes that of the randomized field trials conducted in criminology, only [[nuisance abatement]] per broken windows theory has been successfully replicated.<ref>{{Citation |last=Bailey |first=Ronald |title=The Science of Policy |publisher=The American Conservative |year=2012 |url=https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/the-science-of-policy/ |access-date=2018-09-02 |archive-date=2018-09-03 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180903013323/https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/the-science-of-policy/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Citation |last=Manzi |first=Jim |year=2012 |title=Uncontrolled: The Surprising Payoff of Trial-and-Error for Business, Politics, and Society}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Broken windows theory
(section)
Add topic