Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Two-party system
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Advantages== Some historians have suggested that two-party systems promote centrism and encourage political parties to find common positions which appeal to wide swaths of the electorate. It can lead to political stability,<ref name=Regis/>{{failed verification|date=March 2017}} which leads, in turn, to economic growth. Historian [[Patrick Allitt]] of the [[Teaching Company]] suggested that it is difficult to overestimate the long-term economic benefits of political stability. Sometimes two-party systems have been seen as preferable to multi-party systems because they are simpler to govern, with less fractiousness and greater harmony, since it discourages radical minor parties,<ref name=Regis/> while multi-party systems can sometimes lead to [[hung parliament]]s.<ref name=twsNovGh33>{{cite news |title= What mean will we regress to? |newspaper= The Economist |quote= Certainly, there have been a whole lot of hung parliaments and slow-forming coalitions around the world lately. (Canada, Australia, Britain, the Netherlands, Iraq...) |date= Oct 5, 2010 |url= https://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2010/10/election_dynamics |access-date= 2010-11-07 |archive-date= 2010-11-09 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20101109201358/http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2010/10/election_dynamics |url-status= live }}</ref> [[Politics in Italy|Italy]], with a multi-party system, has had years of divisive politics since 2000, although analyst Silvia Aloisi suggested in 2008 that the nation may be moving closer to a two-party arrangement,<ref name=twsNovGc>{{cite news |author= Silvia Aloisi |title= Election pushes Italy towards two-party system |work= Reuters |quote= Italy's next parliament will have far fewer parties than the previous assembly, pushing the country closer to the two-party system that many commentators say is the only way to end years of political instability. ... |date= Apr 15, 2008 |url= https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL1580537620080415 |access-date= 2010-11-07 |archive-date= 2020-10-02 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20201002181318/https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL1580537620080415 |url-status= live }}</ref> although this no longer seemed the case by the 2010s, which saw the rise of the [[Five Star Movement]] and [[Lega (political party)|Lega]]. The two-party system has generally been identified as simpler since there are fewer voting choices.<ref name=Regis/>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Two-party system
(section)
Add topic