Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Formal power series
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Interpreting formal power series as functions== {{Complex analysis sidebar}} In [[mathematical analysis]], every convergent [[power series]] defines a [[function (mathematics)|function]] with values in the [[real number|real]] or [[complex number|complex]] numbers. Formal power series over certain special rings can also be interpreted as functions, but one has to be careful with the [[function domain|domain]] and [[codomain]]. Let :<math>f = \sum a_n X^n \in R[[X]],</math> and suppose <math>S</math> is a commutative associative algebra over <math>R</math>, <math>I</math> is an ideal in <math>S</math> such that the [[I-adic topology]] on <math>S</math> is complete, and <math>x</math> is an element of <math>I</math>. Define: :<math>f(x) = \sum_{n\ge 0} a_n x^n.</math> This series is guaranteed to converge in <math>S</math> given the above assumptions on <math>x</math>. Furthermore, we have :<math> (f+g)(x) = f(x) + g(x)</math> and :<math> (fg)(x) = f(x) g(x).</math> Unlike in the case of bona fide functions, these formulas are not definitions but have to be proved. Since the topology on <math>R[[X]]</math> is the <math>(X)</math>-adic topology and <math>R[[X]]</math> is complete, we can in particular apply power series to other power series, provided that the arguments don't have [[constant coefficients]] (so that they belong to the ideal <math>(X)</math>): <math>f(0)</math>, <math>f(X^2-X)</math> and <math>f((1-X)^{-1}-1)</math> are all well defined for any formal power series <math>f \in R[[X]].</math> With this formalism, we can give an explicit formula for the multiplicative inverse of a power series <math>f</math> whose constant coefficient <math>a=f(0)</math> is invertible in <math>R</math>: :<math>f^{-1} = \sum_{n \ge 0} a^{-n-1} (a-f)^n.</math> If the formal power series <math>g</math> with <math>g(0)=0</math> is given implicitly by the equation :<math>f(g) =X</math> where <math>f</math> is a known power series with <math>f(0)=0</math>, then the coefficients of <math>g</math> can be explicitly computed using the [[#The Lagrange inversion formula|Lagrange inversion formula]].
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Formal power series
(section)
Add topic