Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Australian Senate
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Allocating terms after a double dissolution === After a double dissolution election, section 13 of the Constitution requires the Senate to divide the senators into two classes, with the first class having a three-year "short term", and the second class a six-year "long term". The Senate may adopt any approach it wants to determine how to allocate the long and short terms, however two methods are currently 'on the table': * "elected-order" method, where the senators elected first attain a six-year term. This approach tends to favour minor party candidates as it gives greater weight to their first preference votes;<ref name="whichones">{{cite web | url = http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-07-05/election-2016-new-senate-terms-explained/7571406 | title = Election 2016: How do we decide which senators are in for three years and which are in for six? | author = Uma Patel | publisher = Australian Broadcasting Corporation | date = 6 July 2016}}</ref> or * re-count method, where the long terms are allocated to those senators who would have been elected first if the election had been a standard half-Senate election.<ref name="longnshort">{{cite web | url = http://blogs.abc.net.au/antonygreen/2016/04/how-long-and-short-terms-are-allocated-after-a-double-dissolution.html | url-status = dead | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20160626235215/http://blogs.abc.net.au/antonygreen/2016/04/how-long-and-short-terms-are-allocated-after-a-double-dissolution.html | archive-date = 26 June 2016 | title = How Long and Short Senate Terms are Allocated After a Double Dissolution | author = [[Antony Green]] | publisher = Australian Broadcasting Corporation | date = 25 April 2016}}</ref> This method is likely to be preferred by the major parties in the Senate where it would deliver more six-year terms to their members.<ref name=whichones /> The Senate applied the "elected-order" method following the [[1987 Australian federal election|1987 double dissolution election]].<ref name=longnshort /> Since that time the Senate has passed resolutions on several occasions indicating its intention to use the re-count method to allocate seats at any future double dissolution, which [[Antony Green|Green]] describes as a fairer approach but notes could be ignored if a majority of senators opted for the "elected-order" method instead.<ref name=longnshort /> In both double dissolution elections since 1987, the "elected order" method was used.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Australian Senate
(section)
Add topic