Editing Émile Durkheim (section)

===Durkheim contra Searle===
Much of Durkheim's work remains unacknowledged in philosophy, despite its direct relevance. As proof, one can look to [[John Searle]], whose book, ''The Construction of Social Reality'', elaborates a theory of social facts and collective representations that Searle believed to be a landmark work that would bridge the gap between [[Analytic philosophy|analytic]] and [[continental philosophy]]. [[Neil Gross]], however, demonstrates how Searle's views on society are more or less a reconstitution of Durkheim's theories of social facts, social institutions, collective representations, and the like. Searle's ideas are thus open to the same criticisms as Durkheim's.<ref>{{harvp|Gross|2006}}</ref> Searle responded by arguing that Durkheim's work was worse than he had originally believed, and, admitting that he had not read much of Durkheim's work: "Because Durkheim's account seemed so impoverished I did not read any further in his work."<ref>{{harvp|Searle|2006}}</ref> [[Steven Lukes|Stephen Lukes]], however, responded to Searle's reply to Gross, refuting, point by point, the allegations that Searle makes against Durkheim, essentially upholding the argument of Gross, that Searle's work bears great resemblance to that of Durkheim. Lukes attributes Searle's miscomprehension of Durkheim's work to the fact that Searle, quite simply, never read Durkheim.<ref>{{Citation|last=Lukes|first=Steven|title=Searle versus Durkheim|date=2007|url=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6104-2_9|work=Intentional Acts and Institutional Facts: Essays on John Searle's Social Ontology|pages=191–202|editor-last=Tsohatzidis|editor-first=Savas L.|series=Theory and Decision Library|place=Dordrecht|publisher=Springer Netherlands|language=en|doi=10.1007/978-1-4020-6104-2_9|isbn=978-1-4020-6104-2|access-date=2020-12-05}}</ref>