Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Radioactive waste
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== High-level waste === {{main|High-level waste}} High-level waste (HLW) is produced by nuclear reactors and the reprocessing of nuclear fuel.<ref>{{Cite web |last1=Pihlak |first1=A. |title=Leaching study of heavy and radioactive elements present in wastes discarded by a uranium extraction and processing facility |url=https://www.osti.gov/etdeweb/servlets/purl/20032295 |access-date=2021-08-05 |website=OSTI}}</ref> The exact definition of HLW differs internationally. After a nuclear fuel rod serves one fuel cycle and is removed from the core, it is considered HLW.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Rogner |first1=H. |title=Nuclear Power and Stable Development |journal=Journal of International Affairs |date=2010 |volume=64 |page=149}}</ref> Spent fuel rods contain mostly uranium with [[fission products]] and [[transuranic element]]s generated in the [[reactor core]]. Spent fuel is highly radioactive and often hot. HLW accounts for over 95% of the total radioactivity produced in the process of nuclear [[electricity generation]] but it contributes to less than 1% of volume of all radioactive waste produced in the UK. Overall, the 60-year-long nuclear program in the UK up until 2019 produced 2150 m<sup>3</sup> of HLW.<ref name=":0" /> The radioactive waste from spent fuel rods consists primarily of cesium-137 and strontium-90, but it may also include plutonium, which can be considered transuranic waste.<ref name="Backgrounder on Radioactive Waste" /> The half-lives of these radioactive elements can differ quite extremely. Some elements, such as cesium-137 and strontium-90 have half-lives of approximately 30 years. Meanwhile, plutonium has a half-life that can stretch to as long as 24,000 years.<ref name="Backgrounder on Radioactive Waste" /> The amount of HLW worldwide is increasing by about 12,000 [[tonne]]s per year.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/nuclear-wastes/radioactive-wastes-myths-and-realities.aspx |title=Myths and Realities of Radioactive Waste |date=February 2016 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160313120210/http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/nuclear-wastes/radioactive-wastes-myths-and-realities.aspx |archive-date=2016-03-13 |access-date=2016-03-13}}</ref> A 1000-[[megawatt]] nuclear power plant produces about 27 tonnes of spent nuclear fuel (unreprocessed) every year.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/Nuclear-Fuel-Cycle/Nuclear-Wastes/Radioactive-Waste-Management/ |title=Radioactive Waste Management |publisher=World Nuclear Association |date=July 2015 |access-date=2015-08-25 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160201064831/http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/Nuclear-Fuel-Cycle/Nuclear-Wastes/Radioactive-Waste-Management/ |archive-date=2016-02-01}}</ref> For comparison, the amount of ash produced by coal power plants in the United States is estimated at 130,000,000 t per year<ref>{{Cite web |last=US Environmental Protection Agency |first=OLEM |date=2014-12-11 |title=Coal Ash Basics |url=https://www.epa.gov/coalash/coal-ash-basics |access-date=2020-03-02 |website=US EPA |language=en-us}}</ref> and fly ash is estimated to release 100 times more radiation than an equivalent nuclear power plant.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/coal-ash-is-more-radioactive-than-nuclear-waste/ |title=Coal Ash Is More Radioactive Than Nuclear Waste |last=Hvistendahl |first=Mara |website=Scientific American |language=en |access-date=2020-03-02}}</ref> [[File:Spent nuclear fuel in the US.jpg|thumb|upright=2|The current locations across the United States where nuclear waste is stored]] In 2010, it was estimated that about 250,000 t of nuclear HLW were stored globally.<ref>Geere, Duncan. (2010-09-20) [https://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2010-09/20/into-eternity-nuclear-waste-finland Where do you put 250,000 tonnes of nuclear waste? (Wired UK)] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160522232044/http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2010-09/20/into-eternity-nuclear-waste-finland |date=2016-05-22 }}. Wired.co.uk. Retrieved on 2015-12-15.</ref> This does not include amounts that have escaped into the environment from accidents or tests. [[Japan]] is estimated to hold 17,000 t of HLW in storage in 2015.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-07-10/japan-s-17-000-tons-of-nuclear-waste-in-search-of-a-home |work=Bloomberg |first=Yuriy |last=Humber |title=Japan's 17,000 Tons of Nuclear Waste in Search of a Home |date=2015-07-10 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170517154128/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-07-10/japan-s-17-000-tons-of-nuclear-waste-in-search-of-a-home |archive-date=2017-05-17}}</ref> As of 2019, the [[United States]] has over 90,000 t of HLW.<ref>{{cite news |date=1 August 2019 |title=What should we do with radioactive nuclear waste? |url=https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/aug/01/what-should-we-do-with-radioactive-nuclear-waste |work=The Guardian |location=London, England |language=en-uk}}</ref> HLW have been shipped to other countries to be stored or reprocessed and, in some cases, shipped back as active fuel. The ongoing controversy over [[High-level radioactive waste management|high-level radioactive waste disposal]] is a major constraint on nuclear power global expansion.<ref name=finlay10 /> Most scientists agree that the main proposed long-term solution is deep geological burial, either in a mine or a deep borehole.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/Nuclear-Fuel-Cycle/Nuclear-Wastes/Radioactive-Waste-Management/ |title=Radioactive Waste Management | Nuclear Waste Disposal |date=July 2015 |publisher=World Nuclear Association |access-date=2015-08-25 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160201064831/http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/Nuclear-Fuel-Cycle/Nuclear-Wastes/Radioactive-Waste-Management/ |archive-date=2016-02-01}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/presidential-commission-seeks-volunteers-to-store-nuclear-waste/ |title=Presidential Commission Seeks Volunteers to Store U.S. Nuclear Waste |author=Biello, David |date=Jul 29, 2011 |work=Scientific American |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140226154256/http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/presidential-commission-seeks-volunteers-to-store-nuclear-waste/ |archive-date=2014-02-26}}</ref> As of 2019, no dedicated civilian high-level nuclear waste site is operational<ref name=finlay10>{{cite web |url=http://acuns.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/NuclearEnergyFuture.pdf |title=Nuclear Energy to 2030 and its Implications for Safety, Security and Nonproliferation: Overview |author=Findlay, Trevor |year=2010 |work=Nuclear energy futures project |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140307175133/http://acuns.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/NuclearEnergyFuture.pdf |archive-date=2014-03-07 |access-date=2015-08-10}}</ref> as small amounts of HLW did not justify the investment in the past. Finland is in the advanced stage of the construction of the [[Onkalo spent nuclear fuel repository]], which is planned to open in 2025 at 400β450 m depth. France is in the planning phase for a 500 m deep Cigeo facility in Bure. Sweden is planning a site in [[Forsmark Nuclear Power Plant|Forsmark]]. Canada plans a 680 m deep facility near Lake Huron in Ontario. The Republic of Korea plans to open a site around 2028.<ref name=":0" /> The site in Sweden enjoys 80% support from local residents as of 2020.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Belgium |first=Central Office, NucNet a s b l, Brussels |date=23 January 2018 |title=Sweden / 'More Than 80%' Approve Of SKB's Spent Fuel Repository Plans |url=https://www.nucnet.org/news/more-than-80-approve-of-skb-s-spent-fuel-repository-plans-5-3-2020 |access-date=2020-05-08 |website=The Independent Global Nuclear News Agency}}</ref> The [[Morris Operation]] in [[Grundy County, Illinois]], is currently the only ''de facto'' high-level radioactive waste storage site in the United States.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Radioactive waste
(section)
Add topic