Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Feminist economics
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Household bargaining=== Central to feminist economics is a different approach to the "family" and "household." In classical economics, those units are typically described as amicable and [[homogeneous]]. [[Gary Becker]] and new home economists introduced the study of "the family" to traditional economics, which usually assumes the family is a single, altruistic unit among which money is distributed equally. Others have concluded that an optimal distribution of commodities and provisions takes place within the family as a result of which they view families in the same manner as individuals.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Samuelson|first1=Paul A.|title=Social Indifference Curves|journal=The Quarterly Journal of Economics|date=February 1956|volume=70|issue=1|pages=9β10|url=http://gatton.uky.edu/faculty/hoytw/751/articles/samuelsonsic.pdf|access-date=15 April 2015|doi=10.2307/1884510|jstor=1884510|url-status = dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140909194253/http://gatton.uky.edu/faculty/hoytw/751/articles/samuelsonsic.pdf|archive-date=9 September 2014}}</ref> These models, according to feminist economists, "endorsed traditional expectations about the sexes," and applied individualistic rational-choice models to explain home behavior.<ref name="nelson1" /> Feminist economists modify these assumptions to account for exploitative sexual and gender relations, [[single-parent families]], [[same-sex relationships]], familial relations with children, and the consequences of reproduction. Specifically, feminist economists move beyond unitary household models and [[game theory]] to show the diversity of household experiences. For example, [[Bina Agarwal]] and others have critiqued the mainstream model and helped provide a better understanding of intra-household bargaining power.<ref name="agarwal">{{cite journal|last=Agarwal|first=Bina|author-link=Bina Agarwal|title=Bargaining and Gender Relations: Within and Beyond the Household|journal=Feminist Economics|date=Spring 1997|volume=3|issue=1|pages=1β51|url=http://www.binaagarwal.com/downloads/apapers/bagaining_and_gender_relations.pdf|doi=10.1080/135457097338799|citeseerx=10.1.1.472.6354}}</ref> Agarwal shows that a lack of power and outside options for women hinders their ability to negotiate within their families. [[Amartya Sen]] shows how social norms that devalue women's unpaid work in the household often disadvantage women in [[intra-household bargaining]]. These feminist economists argue that such claims have important economic outcomes which must be recognized within economic frameworks.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Feminist economics
(section)
Add topic