Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
David Baltimore
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Luk van Parijs case === In 2005, at Baltimore's request, Caltech began investigating the work that [[Luk van Parijs]] had conducted while a postdoc in Baltimore's laboratory.<ref>{{cite web | vauthors = Beckett LE | date = October 31, 2005 | url = http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=509512 | title = MIT Professor Fired for Faking Data; MIT biologist and HMS grad may also have falsified data in work at Harvard | work = Harvard Crimson }}</ref> Van Parijs first came under suspicion at MIT, for work done after he had left Baltimore's lab. After van Parijs had been fired by MIT, his doctoral supervisor also noted problems with work van Parijs did at the Brigham and Women's Hospital, before leaving Harvard to go to Baltimore's lab.<ref>{{cite news |title=More doubts raised on fired MIT professor |url=http://www.boston.com/news/education/higher/articles/2005/10/29/more_doubts_raised_on_fired_mit_professor/ |newspaper=Boston Globe |date=October 29, 2005 | vauthors = Bombardieri M, Cook G }}</ref> The Caltech investigation concluded in March 2007. It found van Parijs alone committed research misconduct, and that four papers co-authored by Baltimore, van Parijs, and others required correction.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Reich ES |title=Scientific misconduct report still under wraps |journal=New Scientist |issue=2361 |page=16 |date=November 24, 2007 |url=https://www.newscientist.com/channel/opinion/mg19626314.400-scientific-misconduct-report-still-under-wraps.html|doi=10.1016/S0262-4079(07)62947-9 }}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
David Baltimore
(section)
Add topic