Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Computational complexity theory
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Separations between other complexity classes=== Many known complexity classes are suspected to be unequal, but this has not been proved. For instance <math>\textsf{P} \subseteq \textsf{NP} \subseteq \textsf{PP} \subseteq \textsf{PSPACE}</math>, but it is possible that <math>\textsf{P} = \textsf{PSPACE}</math>. If <math>\textsf{P}</math> is not equal to <math>\textsf{NP}</math>, then <math>\textsf{P}</math> is not equal to <math>\textsf{PSPACE}</math> either. Since there are many known complexity classes between <math>\textsf{P}</math> and <math>\textsf{PSPACE}</math>, such as <math>\textsf{RP}</math>, <math>\textsf{BPP}</math>, <math>\textsf{PP}</math>, <math>\textsf{BQP}</math>, <math>\textsf{MA}</math>, <math>\textsf{PH}</math>, etc., it is possible that all these complexity classes collapse to one class. Proving that any of these classes are unequal would be a major breakthrough in complexity theory. Along the same lines, <math>\textsf{co-NP}</math> is the class containing the [[Complement (complexity)|complement]] problems (i.e. problems with the ''yes''/''no'' answers reversed) of <math>\textsf{NP}</math> problems. It is believed<ref>[http://www.cs.princeton.edu/courses/archive/spr06/cos522/ Boaz Barak's course on Computational Complexity] [http://www.cs.princeton.edu/courses/archive/spr06/cos522/lec2.pdf Lecture 2]</ref> that <math>\textsf{NP}</math> is not equal to <math>\textsf{co-NP}</math>; however, it has not yet been proven. It is clear that if these two complexity classes are not equal then <math>\textsf{P}</math> is not equal to <math>\textsf{NP}</math>, since <math>\textsf{P} = \textsf{co-P}</math>. Thus if <math>P = NP</math> we would have <math>\textsf{co-P} = \textsf{co-NP}</math> whence <math>\textsf{NP} = \textsf{P} = \textsf{co-P} = \textsf{co-NP}</math>. Similarly, it is not known if <math>\textsf{L}</math> (the set of all problems that can be solved in logarithmic space) is strictly contained in <math>\textsf{P}</math> or equal to <math>\textsf{P}</math>. Again, there are many complexity classes between the two, such as <math>\textsf{NL}</math> and <math>\textsf{NC}</math>, and it is not known if they are distinct or equal classes. It is suspected that <math>\textsf{P}</math> and <math>\textsf{BPP}</math> are equal. However, it is currently open if <math>\textsf{BPP} = \textsf{NEXP}</math>.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Computational complexity theory
(section)
Add topic