Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Stolen Generations
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Use of the word "stolen"=== The word "stolen" is used here to refer to the Aboriginal children having been taken away from their families. It has been in use for this since the early 20th century. For instance, [[Patrick McGarry]], a member of the [[Parliament of New South Wales]], objected to the ''Aborigines Protection Amending Act 1915'' which authorised the Aborigines' Protection Board to remove Aboriginal children from their parents without having to establish cause. McGarry described the policy as "steal[ing] the child away from its parents".<ref name=humanrights1>{{cite web |url=http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/IndigLRes/stolen/stolen09.html |title=Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission: Bringing them Home: Part 2: 3 New South Wales and the ACT |via=AustLII |date=1997 |access-date=25 November 2016}}</ref> In 1924,<ref>The Haebich interview gives the year as 1923, but see Foster, Robert. "'endless trouble and agitation': Aboriginal agitation in the protectionist era," ''Journal of the Historical Society of South Australia,'' 2000;28:15β27.</ref> the ''Adelaide'' ''Sun'' wrote: "The word 'stole' may sound a bit far-fetched but by the time we have told the story of the heart-broken Aboriginal mother we are sure the word will not be considered out of place."<ref>[http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/ockhamsrazor/the-stolen-generation/3503616 Interview with Dr Anna Haebich, "The Stolen Generation," ''Ockham's Razor'', ABC Radio National, broadcast Sunday 6 January 2002. Retrieved 10 August 2012]. Haebich is author of ''Broken Circles, Fragmenting Indigenous Families 1800β2000'', Fremantle: Fremantle Arts Centre Press {{ISBN|1-86368-305-4}}.</ref><ref name="Foster">{{cite web |last=Foster |first=Robert |url=http://www.kooriweb.org/foley/resources/pdfs/34.pdf |title='endless trouble and agitation': Aboriginal activism in the protectionist era |work=Journal of the Historical Society of South Australia |volume=28 |pages=15β27 |year=2000 |access-date=25 November 2016}} refers to the clipping on this case as Endnote 81: ''The Sun'', 16 April 1924; ''Register'' 9 April 1924; ''Sport's Newsclipping Books'' GRG 52/90 SRSA (State Records of South Australia)</ref> In most jurisdictions, Indigenous Australians were put under the authority of a Protector, effectively being made wards of the State.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.aboriginaleducation.sa.edu.au/files/links/Timeline_of_legislation_af.pdf |title=Timeline of Legislation Affecting Aboriginal People |publisher=Government of South Australia, Aboriginal Education and Employment Services |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040225034132/http://www.aboriginaleducation.sa.edu.au/files/links/Timeline_of_legislation_af.pdf |archive-date=25 February 2004}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.foundingdocs.gov.au/item.asp?dID=86 |title=Documenting a Democracy: Aboriginal Protection Act 1869 (Vic) |publisher=National Archives of Australia |access-date=25 April 2010 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090704201937/http://www.foundingdocs.gov.au/item.asp?dID=86 |archive-date=4 July 2009 |quote= In Victoria, for example, "The (Aboriginal Protection) Act gave powers to the Board for the Protection of Aborigines which subsequently developed into an extraordinary level of control of people's lives including regulation of residence, employment, marriage, social life and other aspects of daily life."}}</ref> The protection was done through each jurisdiction's Aboriginal Protection Board; in Victoria and Western Australia these boards were also responsible for applying what were known as ''[[Half-Caste Act]]s''. More recent usage has developed since Peter Read's publication of ''The Stolen Generations: The Removal of Aboriginal Children in New South Wales 1883 to 1969'' (1981), which examined the history of these government actions.<ref name="read" /> The 1997 publication of the government's ''Bringing Them Home β Report of the National Inquiry into the Separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children from Their Families''<ref name="bth1">{{cite web |url=http://www.hreoc.gov.au/social_justice/bth_report/index.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070905075305/http://www.hreoc.gov.au//social_justice/bth_report/index.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=5 September 2007 |title=Bringing them home: The 'Stolen Children' report |access-date=8 October 2006 |publisher=Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission |year=2005}}</ref> heightened awareness of the Stolen Generations. The acceptance of the term in Australia is illustrated by the 2008 formal apology to the Stolen Generations,<ref>Welch, Dylan (13 February 2008), [http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/rudd-says-sorry/2008/02/13/1202760342960.html "Kevin Rudd says sorry"], ''The Sydney Morning Herald''.</ref> led by Prime Minister Kevin Rudd and passed by both houses of the Parliament of Australia. Previous apologies had been offered by State and Territory governments in the period 1997β2001.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.humanrights.gov.au/publications/bringing-them-home-apologies-state-and-territory-parliaments-2008 |title=Content of apologies by State and Territory Parliaments |publisher=[[Australian Human Rights Commission]] |access-date=25 November 2016 |date=14 December 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240205012740/https://humanrights.gov.au/our-work/bringing-them-home-apologies-state-and-territory-parliaments-2008 |archive-date=5 February 2024}}</ref> Some have objected to the use of the term "Stolen Generations". Former Prime Minister [[John Howard]] did not believe the government should apologise to the Australian Aboriginal peoples. Then Minister for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs [[John Herron (Australian politician)|John Herron]] disputed usage of the term in April 2000.<ref name=herron>{{cite web |format=DOC |url=http://www.australianpolitics.com/issues/aborigines/2000-govt-submission-on-stolen-generations-summary.doc |title=Senator the Hon John Herron, Minister for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs to the Senate Legal And Constitutional References Committee, 'Inquiry Into The Stolen Generation', Federal Government Submission |publisher=australianpolitics.com/ |date=March 2000 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050522055358/http://australianpolitics.com/issues/aborigines/2000-govt-submission-on-stolen-generations-summary.doc |archive-date=22 May 2005}}</ref> Others who disputed the use of the term include [[Peter Howson (politician)|Peter Howson]], Minister for Aboriginal Affairs from 1971 to 1972, and [[Keith Windschuttle]], an historian who argues that some of the abuses towards Australian Aboriginal peoples have been exaggerated and in some cases invented.<ref name="Windschuttle2002">{{cite book |last=Windschuttle |first=Keith |author-link=Keith Windschuttle |title=The Fabrication of Aboriginal History: The stolen generations, 1881β2008 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VAd8QgAACAAJ |year=2002 |publisher=Macleay Press |isbn=978-1-876492-19-9 |page=17}}</ref><ref>Disputing the appropriateness of the term: {{cite news |last=Windschuttle |first=Keith |author-link=Keith Windschuttle |title=Don't let facts spoil the day |work=The Australian |date=9 February 2008 |url=http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23182149-28737,00.html |access-date=13 February 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080211172339/http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23182149-28737,00.html |archive-date=11 February 2008 |url-status=dead |df=dmy-all}} argues that the removals were done for the children's good and that Peter Read in{{cite book |last=Read |first=Peter |title=The Stolen Generations: The Removal of Aboriginal children in New South Wales 1883 to 1969 |publisher=Department of Aboriginal Affairs (New South Wales government) |year=1981 |isbn=978-0-646-46221-9}} misrepresented the evidence.</ref> Many historians argue against these denials, including to Windschuttle in particular.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20080216013814/http://www.crikey.com.au/Politics/20080212-Windschuttle.html Dr Naomi Parry, Debunking Windschuttle's benign interpretation of history, ''Crikey'', 12 February 2008], also Peter Read addresses Windschuttle's article of 9 February 2008 in {{cite web |last=Read |first=Peter |title=Don't let facts spoil this historian's campaign |work=The Australian |date=18 February 2008 |url=http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23229208-7583,00.html |access-date=18 February 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080218052203/http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0%2C25197%2C23229208-7583%2C00.html |archive-date=18 February 2008 |url-status=dead |df=dmy-all}}, and {{cite news |last=Manne |first=Robert |author-link=Robert Manne |title=The cruelty of denial |work=[[The Age]] |date=18 February 2008 |url=http://www.theage.com.au/news/robert-manne/the-cruelty-of-denial/2006/09/08/1157222325367.html |access-date=18 February 2008}}</ref> Anthropologist [[Ron Brunton]] also criticised the proceedings on the basis that there was no cross-examination of those giving their testimonies or critical examination of the factual basis of the testimony.<ref name="ABC Radio National">{{cite web |url=http://www.abc.net.au/rn/talks/bbing/stories/s148775.htm |title=Stolen Generations, Background Briefing |work=[[ABC Radio National]] |date=2 July 2000 |access-date=19 February 2008 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110224081345/http://www.abc.net.au/rn/talks/bbing/stories/s148775.htm |archive-date=24 February 2011}}</ref> The ''Bringing Them Home'' report provided extensive details about the removal programs and their effects. [[Ronald Wilson|Sir Ronald Wilson]], former President of the [[Australian Human Rights Commission#Commission presidents|Human Rights and Equal Opportunities Commission]] and a Commissioner on the Inquiry, stated that "when it comes to the credibility of those stories, there is ample credibility, not from the cross-examination of the children themselves, but from the governments whose laws, practices and policies enabled these forced removals to take place. We had the support of every State government; they came to the Inquiry, came with [[Lever Arch|lever-arch files]] setting out the laws from the earliest days right up to the end of the assimilation policy, that is up to the 1970s and more importantly, senior government officers attended. In every case, these senior officers acknowledged that there was a lot of cruelty in the application of those laws and policies."<ref name="ABC Radio National"/> In April 2000, Aboriginal Affairs Minister John Herron tabled a report in the Australian Parliament in response to the Human Rights Commission report which stated that, as "only 10% of Aboriginal children" had been removed, they did not constitute an entire "generation".<ref name=herron/> The report attracted media attention and protests.<ref name="730Report">[http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/stories/s115691.htm "No stolen generation: Australian Govt"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20011119071452/http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/stories/s115691.htm |date=19 November 2001 }}, ''The 7.30 Report'', ABC TV, 3 April 2000. Retrieved 19 February 2008.</ref> Herron apologised for the "understandable offence taken by some people" as a result of his comments, although he refused to alter the report as it had been tabled.{{citation needed|date=August 2021}} Historian Peter Read referred to the children affected as the "Stolen Generations". Another historian, [[Robert Manne]], defended that terminology, making the analogy that other people refer to the "generation that lost their lives in the First World War" without meaning over 50 per cent of the young people at the time; rather, people use that phrasing as a metaphor for a collective experience. Similarly, he believes, some of the Aboriginal community use the term to describe their collective suffering.<ref>[http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/stories/s268644.htm "Academics debate contents of Stolen Generations report"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170622031509/http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/stories/s268644.htm |date=22 June 2017 }}, ''The 7.30 Report'', 29 March 2001. Retrieved 29 November 2011.</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Stolen Generations
(section)
Add topic