Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
RSA cryptosystem
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Faulty key generation=== {{more citations needed|section|date=October 2017}} {{See also|Coppersmith's attack|Wiener's attack}} Finding the large primes {{mvar|p}} and {{mvar|q}} is usually done by testing random numbers of the correct size with probabilistic [[primality test]]s that quickly eliminate virtually all of the nonprimes. The numbers {{mvar|p}} and {{mvar|q}} should not be "too close", lest the [[Fermat factorization]] for {{mvar|n}} be successful. If {{math|''p'' β ''q''}} is less than {{math|2''n''<sup>1/4</sup>}} ({{math|1=''n'' = ''p''β ''q''}}, which even for "small" 1024-bit values of {{mvar|n}} is {{val|3|e=77}}), solving for {{mvar|p}} and {{mvar|q}} is trivial. Furthermore, if either {{math|''p'' β 1}} or {{math|''q'' β 1}} has only small prime factors, {{mvar|n}} can be factored quickly by [[Pollard's p β 1 algorithm|Pollard's ''p'' β 1 algorithm]], and hence such values of {{mvar|p}} or {{mvar|q}} should be discarded. It is important that the private exponent {{mvar|d}} be large enough. Michael J.Β Wiener showed that if {{mvar|p}} is between {{mvar|q}} and {{math|2''q''}} (which is quite typical) and {{math|''d'' < ''n''<sup>1/4</sup>/3}}, then {{mvar|d}} can be computed efficiently from {{mvar|n}} and {{mvar|e}}.<ref name="wiener">{{Cite journal | title=Cryptanalysis of short RSA secret exponents | first1=Michael J. | last1=Wiener | journal=IEEE Transactions on Information Theory | volume=36 | issue=3 | pages=553β558 | date=May 1990 | doi=10.1109/18.54902 | s2cid=7120331 |url=http://www.cits.rub.de/imperia/md/content/may/krypto2ss08/shortsecretexponents.pdf }}</ref> There is no known attack against small public exponents such as {{math|1=''e'' = 3}}, provided that the proper padding is used. [[Coppersmith's attack]] has many applications in attacking RSA specifically if the public exponent {{mvar|e}} is small and if the encrypted message is short and not padded. [[65537]] is a commonly used value for {{mvar|e}}; this value can be regarded as a compromise between avoiding potential small-exponent attacks and still allowing efficient encryptions (or signature verification). The NIST Special Publication on Computer Security (SP 800-78 Rev. 1 of August 2007) does not allow public exponents {{mvar|e}} smaller than 65537, but does not state a reason for this restriction. In October 2017, a team of researchers from [[Masaryk University]] announced the [[ROCA vulnerability]], which affects RSA keys generated by an algorithm embodied in a library from [[Infineon]] known as RSALib. A large number of [[smart card]]s and [[trusted platform module]]s (TPM) were shown to be affected. Vulnerable RSA keys are easily identified using a test program the team released.<ref name=nemecsys>{{cite conference |url=https://crocs.fi.muni.cz/_media/public/papers/nemec_roca_ccs17_preprint.pdf |title=The Return of Coppersmith's Attack: Practical Factorization of Widely Used RSA Moduli |first1=Matus |last1=Nemec |first2=Marek |last2=Sys |first3=Petr |last3=Svenda |first4=Dusan |last4=Klinec |first5=Vashek |last5=Matyas |date=November 2017 |doi=10.1145/3133956.3133969 |book-title=Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security |series=CCS '17}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
RSA cryptosystem
(section)
Add topic