Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Orosius
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Universalism === The Universalist nature of Orosius's work is perhaps its most notable aspect. In fact, despite the lack of agreement regarding all other aspects of Orosius's life, including his biography and his works, most experts agree on the universalist nature of this work, including classicists such as [[Marcelino Menéndez y Pelayo]] and even more modern historians such as Torres Rodríguez.<ref name="torres75">Torres Rodríguez, Casimiro, "Paulo Orosio…", p. 75.</ref> In addition, his works are not only identified as universalist but as the first Christian universalist history, or put another way, the last classical universalist history.<ref name="alonso373">Alonso Ñúñez, José Miguel, "La metodología…", p. 373.</ref> Paulus Orosius is not only a widely studied author he also described his own thoughts on his historical methodology in some of the prologues to the volumes that comprise his "Histories". He was always clear in his objectives, he wanted to write the history starting with the creation and leading up to the times in which he lived, which is a clear declaration of his universalist intentions as a historian.<ref name="alonso379">Alonso Ñúñez, José Miguel, "La metodología…", p. 379.</ref> Orosius uses the so-called "succession of the four world empires theory" throughout his works,<ref name="rabade378">Rábade Navarro, Miguel Ángel, "Una interpretación…", pp. 378.</ref> which traced world history based on the premise that out of the ruins of one great civilization another arose. Therefore, his theory was based on four historical empires, [[Babylonia]], pagan Rome, [[Macedonia (ancient kingdom)|Macedonia]] and [[Carthage]], with a fifth empire, that of Christian Rome as the inheritor of all these.<ref name="rabade381">Rábade Navarro, Miguel Ángel, "Una interpretación…", pp. 381.</ref> In fact, during the narration of their histories the four empires develop in the same way and there are a number of striking parallels between them that are markedly different from Rome, which Orosius praises.<ref name="rabade377"/> Orosius's basic innovation in dealing with the four empires theory was to introduce Carthage between Macedonia and Rome, which is something that scholars such as García Fernández point out as one of Orosius's defining and definitive acts.<ref name="garcia287"/>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Orosius
(section)
Add topic