Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Just war theory
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Traditionalists and Revisionists == There are two altering views related to the just war theory that scholars align with, which are traditionalists and revisionists. The debates between these different viewpoints rest on the moral responsiblites of actors in [[jus in bello]].<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal |last=Pattison |first=James |date=2018 |title=The Case for the Nonideal Morality of War: Beyond Revisionism versus Traditionalism in Just War Theory |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/26419464 |journal=Political Theory |volume=46 |issue=2 |pages=242β268 |doi=10.1177/0090591716669394 |jstor=26419464 |issn=0090-5917|doi-access=free }}</ref> === Traditionalists === In the just war theory as it pertains to ''jus in bello'', traditionalist scholars view that the two principles, ''jus ad bellum'' and ''jus in bello'', are distinct in which actors in war are morally responsible. The traditional view places accountability on leaders who start the war, while soldiers are accountable for actions breaking ''jus in bello''.<ref name=":2">{{Cite journal |last1=Sagan |first1=Scott D. |last2=Valentino |first2=Benjamin A. |date=2019 |title=Just War and Unjust Soldiers: American Public Opinion on the Moral Equality of Combatants |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0892679419000431 |journal=Ethics & International Affairs |volume=33 |issue=4 |pages=411β444 |doi=10.1017/s0892679419000431 |issn=0892-6794}}</ref> === Revisionists === Revisionist scholars view that moral responsibility in conduct of war is placed on individual soldiers who participate in war, even if they follow the rules associated with ''jus in bello''. Soldiers that participate in unjust wars are morally responsible. The revisionist view is based on an individual level, rather than on a collective whole.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Benestad |first=J. Brian |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt3fgpjc |title=Church, State, and Society |date=9 August 2012 |publisher=Catholic University of America Press |doi=10.2307/j.ctt3fgpjc |isbn=978-0-8132-1923-3}}</ref><ref name=":0" /><ref name=":2" />
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Just war theory
(section)
Add topic