Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Groupoid
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Relation to groups == {{Group-like structures}} If a groupoid has only one object, then the set of its morphisms forms a [[group (algebra)|group]]. Using the algebraic definition, such a groupoid is literally just a group.<ref>Mapping a group to the corresponding groupoid with one object is sometimes called delooping, especially in the context of [[Homotopy|homotopy theory]], see {{cite web |url=https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/delooping#delooping_of_a_group_to_a_groupoid |title=delooping in nLab |website=ncatlab.org |access-date=2017-10-31 }}.</ref> Many concepts of [[group theory]] generalize to groupoids, with the notion of [[functor]] replacing that of [[group homomorphism]]. Every transitive/connected groupoid - that is, as explained above, one in which any two objects are connected by at least one morphism - is isomorphic to an action groupoid (as defined above) {{tmath|1= (G, X) }}. By transitivity, there will only be one [[orbit (group theory)|orbit]] under the action. Note that the isomorphism just mentioned is not unique, and there is no [[natural equivalence|natural]] choice. Choosing such an isomorphism for a transitive groupoid essentially amounts to picking one object {{tmath|1= x_0 }}, a [[group isomorphism]] <math>h</math> from <math>G(x_0)</math> to {{tmath|1= G }}, and for each <math>x</math> other than {{tmath|1= x_0 }}, a morphism in <math>G</math> from <math>x_0</math> to {{tmath|1= x }}. If a groupoid is not transitive, then it is isomorphic to a [[disjoint union]] of groupoids of the above type, also called its '''connected components''' (possibly with different groups <math>G</math> and sets <math>X</math> for each connected component). In category-theoretic terms, each connected component of a groupoid is [[equivalent categories|equivalent]] (but not [[isomorphic categories|isomorphic]]) to a groupoid with a single object, that is, a single group. Thus any groupoid is equivalent to a [[multiset]] of unrelated groups. In other words, for equivalence instead of isomorphism, one does not need to specify the sets {{tmath|1= X }}, but only the groups {{tmath|1= G }}. For example, *The fundamental groupoid of <math>X</math> is equivalent to the collection of the [[fundamental group]]s of each [[path-connected component]] of {{tmath|1= X }}, but an isomorphism requires specifying the set of points in each component; *The set <math>X</math> with the equivalence relation <math>\sim</math> is equivalent (as a groupoid) to one copy of the [[trivial group]] for each [[equivalence class]], but an isomorphism requires specifying what each equivalence class is; *The set <math>X</math> equipped with an [[Group action (mathematics)|action]] of the group <math>G</math> is equivalent (as a groupoid) to one copy of <math>G</math> for each [[orbit (group theory)|orbit]] of the action, but an [[isomorphism]] requires specifying what set each orbit is. The collapse of a groupoid into a mere collection of groups loses some information, even from a category-theoretic point of view, because it is not [[natural (category theory)|natural]]. Thus when groupoids arise in terms of other structures, as in the above examples, it can be helpful to maintain the entire groupoid. Otherwise, one must choose a way to view each <math>G(x)</math> in terms of a single group, and this choice can be arbitrary. In the example from [[topology]], one would have to make a coherent choice of paths (or equivalence classes of paths) from each point <math>p</math> to each point <math>q</math> in the same path-connected component. As a more illuminating example, the classification of groupoids with one [[endomorphism]] does not reduce to purely group theoretic considerations. This is analogous to the fact that the classification of [[vector space]]s with one endomorphism is nontrivial. Morphisms of groupoids come in more kinds than those of groups: we have, for example, [[fibration]]s, [[covering morphism]]s, [[universal morphism]]s, and [[quotient morphism]]s. Thus a subgroup <math>H</math> of a group <math>G</math> yields an action of <math>G</math> on the set of [[coset]]s of <math>H</math> in <math>G</math> and hence a covering morphism <math>p</math> from, say, <math>K</math> to {{tmath|1= G }}, where <math>K</math> is a groupoid with [[#Vertex groups and orbits|vertex group]]s isomorphic to {{tmath|1= H }}. In this way, presentations of the group <math>G</math> can be "lifted" to presentations of the groupoid {{tmath|1= K }}, and this is a useful way of obtaining information about presentations of the subgroup {{tmath|1= H }}. For further information, see the books by Higgins and by Brown in the References.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Groupoid
(section)
Add topic