Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Sturgeon's law
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Precedents and proponents == In the 1870 novel, ''[[Lothair (novel)|Lothair]]'', by [[Benjamin Disraeli]], it is asserted that: <blockquote>Nine-tenths of existing books are nonsense, and the clever books are the refutation of that nonsense.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Disraeli |first=Benjamin |title=Lothair |year=1870 |chapter=Chapter 29}}</ref> </blockquote>A similar adage appears in [[Rudyard Kipling]]'s ''[[The Light That Failed]]'', published in 1890. {{quote|Four-fifths of everybody's work must be bad. But the remnant is worth the trouble for its own sake.<ref name="google">{{cite book |title=The Writings in Prose and Verse of Rudyard Kipling |last=Kipling |first=Rudyard |author-link=Rudyard Kipling |isbn=9785874724696|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kRELAwAAQBAJ|year=1897|publisher=Рипол Классик }}</ref>}} A 1946 essay ''[[Confessions of a Book Reviewer]]'' by [[George Orwell]] asserts about books: {{quote|In much more than nine cases out of ten the only objectively truthful criticism would be "This book is worthless ..."<ref name="orwell">{{cite web |first=G. |last=Orwell |author-link=George Orwell |year=1946 |title=Confessions of a Book Reviewer |url=https://www.orwellfoundation.com/the-orwell-foundation/orwell/essays-and-other-works/confessions-of-a-book-reviewer/}}</ref>}} In 2009, a paper published in ''[[The Lancet]]'' estimated that over 85% of health and medical research is wasted.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Chalmers |first1=Iain |last2=Glasziou |first2=Paul |date=4 July 2009 |title=Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence |url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19525005/ |journal=The Lancet |volume=374 |issue=9683 |pages=86–9 |doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60329-9 |pmid=19525005 |access-date=7 January 2025}}</ref> In 2013, philosopher [[Daniel Dennett]] championed Sturgeon's law as one of his seven tools for critical thinking.<ref>{{cite web |first=D. |last=Dennett |author-link=Daniel Dennett |date=21 May 2013 |title=Daniel Dennett presents ''Seven Tools for Critical Thinking'' |website=OpenCulture.com |url=http://www.openculture.com/2013/05/philosopher_daniel_dennett_presents_seven_tools_for_critical_thinking.html}}</ref> {{quote|90% of everything is crap. That is true, whether you are talking about physics, chemistry, evolutionary psychology, sociology, medicine{{snd}} you name it{{snd}} rock music, country western. 90% of everything is crap.<ref>{{cite book |first=D. |last=Dennett |author-link=Daniel Dennett |year=2013 |title=Seven Tools for Critical Thinking}}</ref>}}
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Sturgeon's law
(section)
Add topic