Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Strange loop
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== In cognitive science == According to Hofstadter, strange loops take form in human consciousness as the complexity of active symbols in the brain inevitably leads to the same kind of self-reference which [[Kurt Gödel|Gödel]] proved was inherent in any sufficiently complex logical or arithmetical system (that allows for arithmetic by means of the [[Peano axioms]]) in his [[Gödel's incompleteness theorems|incompleteness theorem]].<ref>{{cite journal|last=Johnson|first=George|title=A New Journey into Hofstadter's Mind|journal=Scientific American|date=March 2007|volume=296|issue=3|pages=98–102|doi=10.1038/scientificamerican0307-98|bibcode=2007SciAm.296c..98J|url=http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=a-new-journey-into-hofsta|access-date=8 October 2011}}</ref> Gödel showed that mathematics and logic contain strange loops: propositions that not only refer to [[logical truth|mathematical and logical truths]], but also to the symbol systems expressing those truths. This leads to the sort of paradoxes seen in statements such as "[[This statement is false]]," wherein the sentence's basis of truth is found in referring to itself and its assertion, causing a logical paradox.<ref name="oreilly">{{cite journal|last=O'Reilly|first=Scott|title=I Am A Strange Loop by Douglas Hofstadter|journal=Philosophy Now|year=2010|url=http://www.philosophynow.org/issue78/I_Am_A_Strange_Loop_by_Douglas_Hofstadter|access-date=8 October 2011}}</ref> Hofstadter argues that the psychological self arises out of a similar kind of paradox. The brain is not born with an "I" – the [[Ego (Freudian)|ego]] emerges only gradually as experience shapes the brain's dense web of active symbols into a tapestry rich and complex enough to begin [[Self-reference|twisting back upon itself]]. According to this view, the psychological "I" is a narrative fiction, something created only from intake of symbolic data and the brain's ability to create stories about itself from that data. The consequence is that a self-perspective is a culmination of a unique pattern of symbolic activity in the brain, which suggests that the pattern of symbolic activity that makes identity, that constitutes subjectivity, can be replicated within the brains of others, and likely even in [[Artificial brain|artificial brains]].<ref name="oreilly" />
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Strange loop
(section)
Add topic