Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Sino-Tibetan languages
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Early work=== During the 18th century, several scholars noticed parallels between Tibetan and Burmese, both languages with extensive literary traditions. Early in the following century, [[Brian Houghton Hodgson]] and others noted that many non-literary languages of the highlands of northeast India and Southeast Asia were also related to these. The name "Tibeto–Burman" was first applied to this group in 1856 by [[James Richardson Logan]], who added [[Karen languages|Karen]] in 1858.{{sfnp|Logan|1856|p=31}}{{sfnp|Logan|1858}} The third volume of the ''[[Linguistic Survey of India]]'', edited by [[Sten Konow]], was devoted to the Tibeto–Burman languages of [[British India]].{{sfnp|Hale|1982|p=4}} Studies of the "Indo–Chinese" languages of Southeast Asia from the mid-19th century by Logan and others revealed that they comprised four families: Tibeto–Burman, [[Tai languages|Tai]], [[Mon–Khmer languages|Mon–Khmer]] and [[Malayo-Polynesian languages|Malayo–Polynesian]]. [[Julius Klaproth]] had noted in 1823 that Burmese, Tibetan, and Chinese all shared common basic [[vocabulary]] but that [[Thai language|Thai]], [[Mon language|Mon]], and [[Vietnamese language|Vietnamese]] were quite different.{{sfnp|van Driem|2001|p=334}}{{sfnp|Klaproth|1823|pp=346, 363–365}} [[Ernst Kuhn]] envisaged a group with two branches, Chinese–Siamese and Tibeto–Burman.{{efn|{{harvp|Kuhn|1889|p=189}}: "wir das Tibetisch-Barmanische einerseits, das Chinesisch-Siamesische anderseits als deutlich geschiedene und doch wieder verwandte Gruppen einer einheitlichen Sprachfamilie anzuerkennen haben." (also quoted in {{harvp|van Driem|2001|p=264}}.)}} [[August Conrady]] called this group Indo–Chinese in his influential 1896 classification, though he had doubts about Karen. Conrady's terminology was widely used, but there was uncertainty regarding his exclusion of Vietnamese. [[Franz Nikolaus Finck]] in 1909 placed Karen as a third branch of Chinese–Siamese.{{sfnp|van Driem|2001|p=344}}{{sfnp|Finck|1909|p=57}} [[Jean Przyluski]] introduced the French term ''sino–tibétain'' as the title of his chapter on the group in [[Antoine Meillet|Meillet]] and [[Marcel Cohen|Cohen]]'s ''Les langues du monde'' in 1924.{{sfnp|Przyluski|1924|p=361}}{{sfnp|Sapir|1925|p=373}} He divided them into three groups: Tibeto–Burman, Chinese and Tai,{{sfnp|Przyluski|1924|p=361}} and was uncertain about the affinity of Karen and [[Hmong–Mien]].{{sfnp|Przyluski|1924|p=380}} The English translation "Sino–Tibetan" first appeared in a short note by Przyluski and [[Gordon Luce|Luce]] in 1931.{{sfnp|Przyluski|Luce|1931}}
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Sino-Tibetan languages
(section)
Add topic