Editing Scientology and law (section)

==L. Ron Hubbard and lawsuits==
Critics state that the ultimate aim of Scientology lawsuits is to destroy church opponents by [[Strategic lawsuit against public participation|forcing them into bankruptcy or submission]], using its resources to pursue [[frivolous litigation|frivolous lawsuits]] at considerable cost to defendants. In doing so, they draw particular attention to certain controversial statements made by Scientology founder, [[L. Ron Hubbard]], in the 1950s and 1960s.<ref name="Offensive">
{{cite news | first=Joel | last=Sappell |author2=Welkos, Robert W.  | url=https://www.latimes.com/local/la-scientology062990x-story.html | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080421025309/http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-scientology062990x,0,138179,full.story | url-status=live | archive-date=April 21, 2008 | title=On the Offensive Against an Array of Suspected Foes | work=[[Los Angeles Times]] | date=June 29, 1990 | access-date=2007-08-13}}
</ref><ref name="sptimes1979">{{cite web |url=http://sptimes.com/2006/webspecials06/scientology/Scientology_Special_Report.pdf |title=Scientology: An in-depth profile of a new force in Clearwater |date=1979 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070809193839/http://sptimes.com/2006/webspecials06/scientology/Scientology_Special_Report.pdf |archive-date=August 9, 2007 |first=Charles |last=Stafford |publisher=[[St Petersburg Times]] }} {{cite web |url=https://www.pulitzer.org/winners/bette-swenson-orsini-and-charles-stafford |title=The 1980 Pulitzer Prize Winner in National Reporting |website=[[Pulitzer Prize|The Pulitzer Prizes]]}}</ref>

In 1994, Scientology attorney [[Moxon & Kobrin|Helena Kobrin]] was fined $17,775 for filing a frivolous lawsuit.<ref name="kobrin-fine">
{{cite web|url=http://www.lermanet.com/cos/kobrinsanctions.htm|title=Scientology's Scientologist Attorney Helena Kobrin|access-date=2006-08-09}}</ref> U.S. District Court Judge [[Leonie Brinkema]] cited a frequently quoted statement of L. Ron Hubbard on the subject in the case of ''Religious Technology Center vs. The Washington Post'', on November 28, 1995:<ref name="rtc-v-post">{{cite web |url=http://www.lermanet.com/scientologylegal/brinkema-washpost.txt |title=Religious Technology Center vs. The Washington Post}}</ref>

{{blockquote|The purpose of the suit is to harass and discourage rather than win. The law can be used very easily to harass, and enough harassment on somebody who is simply on the thin edge anyway, well knowing that he is not authorized, will generally be sufficient to cause professional decease. If possible, of course, ruin him utterly.|[[L. Ron Hubbard]]|The Scientologist, a Manual on the Dissemination of Material, 1955<ref>The Technical Bulletins of Dianetics and Scientology, Volume II, 1954-1956, pp. 157</ref>}}

Critics also allege that the Church uses litigation as a cover for intimidation tactics, such as investigating the [[criminal record]]s (or lack thereof) of opponents and subjecting them to [[surveillance]] and invasive inquiries, both to discourage further criticism and to ensure the opponent's unwillingness to fight the lawsuit. A policy letter by L. Ron Hubbard, distributed in early 1966, says:
{{blockquote|text=This is correct procedure:
# Spot who is attacking us.
# Start investigating them promptly for FELONIES or worse using own professionals, not outside agencies.
# Double curve our reply by saying we welcome an investigation of them.
# Start feeding lurid, blood sex crime actual evidence on the attackers to the press.
Don't ever tamely submit to an investigation of us. Make it rough, rough on attackers all the way.<ref name="attacks-lrh">
''[http://www.clambake.org/archive/books/bfm/makeitro.htm Attacks on Scientology]'' by L. Ron Hubbard, "HCO Policy Letter of 15 February 1966"
</ref>}}

Critics of Scientology cite this passage, among others (such as the widely documented [[Fair game (Scientology)|fair game doctrine]]), to support their contentions that the church uses smear tactics to augment the effectiveness of legal threats.<ref name="Offensive"/><ref name="sptimes1979"/>