Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Roman triumph
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===The ''vir triumphalis''=== In Republican Rome, truly exceptional military achievement merited the highest possible honours, which connected the ''vir triumphalis'' ("man of triumph", later known as a ''triumphator'') to Rome's mythical and semi-mythical past. In effect, the general was close to being "king for a day", and possibly close to divinity. He wore the regalia traditionally associated both with the ancient [[Roman monarchy]] and with the statue of ''Jupiter Capitolinus'': the purple and gold "toga picta", laurel crown, red boots and, again possibly, the red-painted face of Rome's supreme deity. He was drawn in procession through the city in a four-horse chariot, under the gaze of his peers and an applauding crowd, to the [[Temple of Jupiter Optimus Maximus|temple of Capitoline Jupiter]]. His spoils and captives led the way; his armies followed behind. Once at the Capitoline temple, he sacrificed two white oxen to [[Jupiter (mythology)|Jupiter]], and laid tokens of victory at the feet of Jupiter's statue, thus dedicating the triumph to the Roman Senate, people, and gods.<ref>A summary of disparate viewpoints regarding the Triumph is in Versnel, 56β93: limited preview via [https://books.google.com/books?id=DswUAAAAIAAJ&dq=%22Within+the+range+of+opinions%22+inauthor%3AVersnel&pg=PA57 Books.Google.com]</ref> Triumphs were tied to no particular day, season, or religious festival of the [[Roman calendar]]. Most seem to have been celebrated at the earliest practicable opportunity, probably on days that were deemed auspicious for the occasion. Tradition required that, for the duration of a triumph, every temple was open. The ceremony was thus, in some sense, shared by the whole community of Roman gods,<ref>Versnel, p. 386.</ref> but overlaps were inevitable with specific festivals and anniversaries. Some may have been coincidental; others were designed. For example, March 1, the festival and [[Glossary of ancient Roman religion#dies natalis|''dies natalis'']] of the war god [[Mars (mythology)|Mars]], was the traditional anniversary of the first triumph by [[Publius Valerius Publicola|Publicola]] (504 BCE), of six other Republican triumphs, and of the very first Roman triumph by [[Romulus]].<ref>Beard, p. 77.</ref> [[Pompey]] postponed his third and most magnificent triumph for several months to make it coincide with his own ''dies natalis'' (birthday).<ref>Beard, p. 7.</ref><ref>Denis Feeney, ''Caesar's Calendar: Ancient Time and the Beginnings of History'', University of California Press (2008) p. 148.</ref> Religious dimensions aside, the focus of the triumph was the general himself. The ceremony promoted him β however temporarily β above every mortal Roman. This was an opportunity granted to very few. From the time of [[Scipio Africanus]], the triumphal general was linked (at least for historians during the Principate) to [[Alexander the Great|Alexander]] and the demi-god [[Hercules]], who had laboured selflessly for the benefit of all mankind.<ref>Beard, 72β75. See also Diodorus, 4.5 at Thayer: [https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Diodorus_Siculus/4A*.html#5.2 Uchicago.edu]</ref><ref>Beard ''et al'', 85β87: see also Polybius, 10.2.20, who suggests that Scipio's assumption of divine connections (and the personal favour of divine guidance) was unprecedented and seemed suspiciously "Greek" to his more conservative peers.</ref><ref>See also Galinsky, 106, 126β149, for Heraklean/Herculean associations of Alexander, Scipio, and later triumphing Roman generals.</ref> His sumptuous triumphal chariot was bedecked with [[fascinus|charms]] against the possible envy (''[[invidia]]'') and malice of onlookers.<ref>Versnel, p. 380.</ref><ref>Various Roman sources describe the different charms employed against envy during triumphs, not necessarily at the same event; they include an assemblage of miniature bells (''[[Tintinnabulum (Ancient Rome)|tintinnabulum]]'') and a whip on the chariot's dashboard. In Pliny, a sacred [[Fascinus|phallos]] loaned by the [[Vestal Virgins]] is slung between the chariot wheels; see Beard, pp. 83β85.</ref> In some accounts, a companion or [[servus publicus|public slave]] would remind him from time to time of his own mortality (a ''[[memento mori]]'').<ref>The very few accounts are from the Imperial era of a public slave (or other figure) who stands behind or near the triumphator to remind him that he "is but mortal" or prompts him to "look behind", and are open to a variety of interpretations. Nevertheless, they imply a tradition that the triumphing general was publicly reminded of his mortal nature, whatever his kingly appearance, temporary godlike status, or divine associations. See Beard, pp. 85β92.</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Roman triumph
(section)
Add topic