Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Reinforcement learning
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Exploration == The exploration vs. exploitation trade-off has been most thoroughly studied through the [[multi-armed bandit]] problem and for finite state space Markov decision processes in Burnetas and Katehakis (1997).<ref name="Optimal adaptive policies for Marko">{{citation | last1 = Burnetas|first1 = Apostolos N.|last2 = Katehakis|first2 = Michael N.|author-link2 = Michael N. Katehakis|year = 1997|title = Optimal adaptive policies for Markov Decision Processes|journal = [[Mathematics of Operations Research]] |volume = 22 | issue=1 |pages = 222–255 |doi=10.1287/moor.22.1.222 | jstor=3690147}}</ref> Reinforcement learning requires clever exploration mechanisms; randomly selecting actions, without reference to an estimated probability distribution, shows poor performance. The case of (small) finite Markov decision processes is relatively well understood. However, due to the lack of algorithms that scale well with the number of states (or scale to problems with infinite state spaces), simple exploration methods are the most practical. One such method is <math>\varepsilon</math>-greedy, where <math>0 < \varepsilon < 1</math> is a parameter controlling the amount of exploration vs. exploitation. With probability <math>1-\varepsilon</math>, exploitation is chosen, and the agent chooses the action that it believes has the best long-term effect (ties between actions are broken uniformly at random). Alternatively, with probability <math>\varepsilon</math>, exploration is chosen, and the action is chosen uniformly at random. <math>\varepsilon</math> is usually a fixed parameter but can be adjusted either according to a schedule (making the agent explore progressively less), or adaptively based on heuristics.<ref>{{citation | last1 = Tokic | first1 = Michel | last2 = Palm | first2 = Günther | chapter = Value-Difference Based Exploration: Adaptive Control Between Epsilon-Greedy and Softmax | pages = 335–346 | publisher = Springer | series = Lecture Notes in Computer Science | title = KI 2011: Advances in Artificial Intelligence | volume = 7006 | year = 2011 | chapter-url = http://www.tokic.com/www/tokicm/publikationen/papers/KI2011.pdf | isbn = 978-3-642-24455-1}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Reinforcement learning
(section)
Add topic