Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Organic compound
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==History== ===Vitalism=== {{Main|Vitalism}} [[Vitalism]] was a widespread conception that substances found in organic nature are formed from the chemical elements by the action of a "vital force"<ref name="Encyclopedia Britannica 1998 l574">{{cite web | title=Life Force, Naturalism & Holism | website=Encyclopedia Britannica | date=July 20, 1998 | url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/vitalism | access-date=March 10, 2024}}</ref> or "life-force" (''vis vitalis'') that only living organisms possess.<ref name="Naylor_2023">{{cite journal |last1=Naylor |first1=R. L. |last2=Martin |first2=J. D. |last3=Staley |first3=R. |date=2023 |title=Vital Physics |url=https://rdcu.be/dAJAX |journal=Physics in Perspective |volume=25 |issue=1–2 |pages=1–2 |doi=10.1007/s00016-023-00297-z |bibcode=2023PhP....25....1N |access-date=2024-03-10}}</ref> In the 1810s, [[Jöns Jacob Berzelius]] argued that a regulative force must exist within living bodies. Berzelius also contended that compounds could be distinguished by whether they required any organisms in their [[Biosynthesis|synthesis]] (organic compounds) or whether they did not ([[inorganic compounds]]).<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Wilkinson|first=Ian|date=2002-06-10|title=History of Clinical Chemistry|journal=EJIFCC|volume=13|issue=4|pages=114–118|issn=1650-3414|pmc=6208063}}</ref> Vitalism taught that formation of these "organic" compounds were fundamentally different from the "inorganic" compounds that could be obtained from the elements by chemical manipulations in laboratories.<ref name="Coulter_2019">{{cite journal |last1=Coulter |first1=Ian |last2=Snider |first2=Pamela |last3=Neil |first3=Amy |date=June 2019 |title=Vitalism–A Worldview Revisited: A Critique Of Vitalism And Its Implications For Integrative Medicine |journal=Integrative Medicine: A Clinician's Journal |volume=18 |issue=3 |pages=60–73 |pmid= 32549817 |pmc=7217401 }}</ref><ref name="Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy 2024 c869">{{cite web | title=Vitalism: Physiological Chemistry | website=Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy | date=March 10, 2024 | url=https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/vitalism/v-1/sections/physiological-chemistry | access-date=March 10, 2024}}</ref> Vitalism survived for a short period after the formulation of modern ideas about the [[atomic theory]] and [[chemical element]]s. It first came under question in 1824, when [[Friedrich Wöhler]] synthesized [[oxalic acid]], a compound known to occur only in living organisms, from [[cyanogen]]. A further experiment was [[Wöhler synthesis|Wöhler's 1828 synthesis]] of [[urea]] from the inorganic [[salt (chemistry)|salts]] [[potassium cyanate]] and [[ammonium sulfate]]. Urea had long been considered an "organic" compound, as it was known to occur only in the urine of living organisms. Wöhler's experiments were followed by many others, in which increasingly complex "organic" substances were produced from "inorganic" ones without the involvement of any living organism, thus disproving vitalism.<ref>{{cite book|title=A Source Book in Chemistry, 1400-1900|author=Henry Marshall Leicester|author-link=Henry Marshall Leicester|author2=Herbert S. Klickstein|publisher=Harvard University Press|date=1951|page=309}}</ref> ===Modern classification and ambiguities=== [[Image:L-isoleucine-3D-balls.png|thumb|upright=0.8|The [[isoleucine|<small>L</small>-isoleucine]] molecule, {{chem2|C6H13NO2}}, showing features typical of organic compounds. Carbon atoms are in black, hydrogens gray, oxygens red, and nitrogen blue.]] Although vitalism has been discredited, scientific nomenclature retains the distinction between ''organic'' and ''inorganic'' compounds. The modern meaning of ''organic compound'' is any compound that contains a significant amount of carbon—even though many of the organic compounds known today have no connection to any substance found in living organisms. The term ''carbogenic'' has been proposed by [[E. J. Corey]] as a modern alternative to ''organic'', but this neologism remains relatively obscure.{{cn|date=January 2024}} The organic compound [[isoleucine|<small>L</small>-isoleucine]] molecule presents some features typical of organic compounds: [[carbon–carbon bond]]s, [[carbon–hydrogen bond]]s, as well as covalent bonds from carbon to oxygen and to nitrogen.{{cn|date=January 2024}} As described in detail below, any definition of organic compound that uses simple, broadly-applicable criteria turns out to be unsatisfactory, to varying degrees. The modern, commonly accepted definition of organic compound essentially amounts to any carbon-containing compound, excluding several classes of substances traditionally considered "inorganic". The list of substances so excluded varies from author to author. Still, it is generally agreed upon that there are (at least) a few carbon-containing compounds that should not be considered organic. For instance, almost all authorities would require the exclusion of [[alloys]] that contain carbon, including [[steel]] (which contains [[cementite]], {{chem2|Fe3C}}), as well as other metal and semimetal carbides (including "ionic" carbides, e.g, [[Al4C3|{{chem2|Al4C3}}]] and [[Calcium carbide|{{chem2|CaC2}}]] and "covalent" carbides, e.g. [[Boron carbide|{{chem2|B4C}}]] and [[Silicon carbide|SiC]], and graphite intercalation compounds, e.g. [[Graphite intercalation compound|{{chem2|KC8}}]]). Other compounds and materials that are considered 'inorganic' by most authorities include: metal [[carbonates]], simple [[oxides]] of carbon ([[Carbon monoxide|CO]], [[Carbon dioxide|{{chem2|CO2}}]], and arguably, [[carbon suboxide|{{chem2|C3O2}}]]), the [[allotropes]] of carbon, [[cyanides|cyanide]] derivatives not containing an organic residue (e.g., [[potassium cyanide|KCN]], [[Cyanogen|{{chem2|(CN)2}}]], [[Cyanogen bromide|BrCN]], [[cyanate]] anion {{chem2|OCN−}}, etc.), and heavier analogs thereof (e.g., [[cyaphide]] anion {{chem2|CP−}}, [[Carbon diselenide|{{chem2|CSe2}}]], [[Carbonyl sulfide|COS]]; although [[carbon disulfide]] {{chem2|CS2}} is often classed as an ''organic'' solvent). Halides of carbon without hydrogen (e.g., [[Carbon tetrafluoride|{{chem2|CF4}}]] and [[Chlorotrifluoromethane|{{chem2|CClF3}}]]), [[phosgene]] ({{chem2|COCl2}}), [[carborane]]s, [[metal carbonyl]]s (e.g., [[nickel tetracarbonyl]]), [[mellitic anhydride]] ({{chem2|C12O9}}), and other exotic [[oxocarbon]]s are also considered inorganic by some authorities.{{cn|date=January 2024}} [[Nickel tetracarbonyl]] ({{chem2|Ni(CO)4}}) and other metal carbonyls are often volatile liquids, like many organic compounds, yet they contain only carbon bonded to a transition metal and to oxygen, and are often prepared directly from metal and [[carbon monoxide]]. Nickel tetracarbonyl is typically classified as an ''[[organometallic compound]]'' as it satisfies the broad definition that [[organometallic chemistry]] covers all compounds that contain at least one carbon to metal covalent bond; it is unknown whether organometallic compounds form a subset of organic compounds. For example, the evidence of covalent Fe-C bonding in [[cementite]],<ref>{{cite journal|doi = 10.1063/1.2884529|journal = [[Journal of Applied Physics]]|volume = 103|issue = 4|year = 2008|title = Structural, elastic, and electronic properties of Fe<sub>3</sub>C from first principles|first1 = C.|last1 = Jiang|first2 = S. G.|last2 = Srinivasan|first3 = A.|last3 = Caro|first4 = S. A.|last4 = Maloy|pages = 043502–043502–8|arxiv = 0711.1528|bibcode = 2008JAP...103d3502J|s2cid = 94576016}}</ref> a major component of steel, places it within this broad definition of organometallic, yet steel and other carbon-containing alloys are seldom regarded as organic compounds. Thus, it is unclear whether the definition of organometallic should be narrowed, whether these considerations imply that organometallic compounds are not necessarily organic, or both.{{cn|date=February 2024}} Metal complexes with organic ligands but no carbon-metal bonds (e.g., [[Copper(II) acetate|{{chem2|(CH3CO2)2Cu}}]]) are not considered organometallic; instead, they are called [[metal-organic compound]]s (and might be considered organic). The relatively narrow definition of organic compounds as those containing C-H bonds excludes compounds that are (historically and practically) considered organic. Neither [[urea]] {{chem2|CO(NH2)2}} nor [[oxalic acid]] {{chem2|(COOH)2}} are organic by this definition, yet they were two key compounds in the vitalism debate. However, the [[Nomenclature of Organic Chemistry|IUPAC Blue Book]] on organic nomenclature specifically mentions urea<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.acdlabs.com/iupac/nomenclature/79/r79_661.htm|title=IUPAC Blue Book, Urea and Its Derivatives Rule C-971|access-date=2009-11-22|archive-date=2021-05-06|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210506235155/https://www.acdlabs.com/iupac/nomenclature/79/r79_661.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> and oxalic acid<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.acdlabs.com/iupac/nomenclature/93/r93_705.htm|title=IUPAC Blue Book, Table 28(a) Carboxylic acids and related groups. Unsubstituted parent structures|access-date=2009-11-22|archive-date=2021-06-28|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210628213602/https://www.acdlabs.com/iupac/nomenclature/93/r93_705.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> as organic compounds. Other compounds lacking C-H bonds but traditionally considered organic include [[benzenehexol]], [[mesoxalic acid]], and [[carbon tetrachloride]]. [[Mellitic acid]], which contains no C-H bonds, is considered a possible organic compound in [[Mars|Martian]] soil.<ref>{{cite journal |author1=S. A. Benner |author2=K. G. Devine |author3=L. N. Matveeva |author4=D. H. Powell | year = 2000 | title = The missing organic molecules on Mars | journal = [[Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences]] | volume = 97 | issue = 6 | pages = 2425–2430 | doi = 10.1073/pnas.040539497 | pmid = 10706606 | pmc = 15945 |bibcode = 2000PNAS...97.2425B |doi-access=free }}</ref> Terrestrially, it, and its anhydride, [[mellitic anhydride]], are associated with the mineral [[mellite]] ({{chem2|Al2C6(COO)6*16H2O}}). A slightly broader definition of the organic compound includes all compounds bearing C-H or C-C bonds. This would still exclude urea. Moreover, this definition still leads to somewhat arbitrary divisions in sets of carbon-halogen compounds. For example, [[tetrafluoromethane|{{chem2|CF4}}]] and [[Carbon tetrachloride|{{chem2|CCl4}}]] would be considered by this rule to be "inorganic", whereas [[fluoroform|{{chem2|CHF3}}]], [[Chloroform|{{chem2|CHCl3}}]], and [[Hexachloroethane|{{chem2|C2Cl6}}]] would be organic, though these compounds share many physical and chemical properties.{{cn|date=February 2024}}
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Organic compound
(section)
Add topic