Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Neptunism
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== The neptunist–plutonist controversy == A rival theory known as [[plutonism]] (or vulcanism) held that rocks were formed in fire. This was originally proposed by Abbé [[Anton Moro]] (1687–1750) with reference to his studies of volcanic islands, and was taken up by [[James Hutton]] who put forward a [[Uniformitarianism (science)|uniformitarian]] theory of a [[rock cycle]] extending over infinite time in which rocks were worn away by weathering and erosion, then were re-formed and uplifted by heat and pressure. Neptunists differed from the plutonists in holding that [[basalt]] was a sedimentary deposit which included fossils and so could not be of volcanic origin. Hutton correctly asserted that basalt never contained fossils and was always insoluble, hard, and crystalline. He found geological formations in which basalt cut through layers of other rocks, supporting his theory that it originated from molten rock under the Earth's crust. The debate was not just between scientists. [[Johann Wolfgang von Goethe]], one of the most respected authors of the day, took sides with the neptunists. The fourth act of his famous work ''[[Goethe's Faust|Faust]]'' contains a dialogue between a neptunist and a plutonist, the latter being [[Mephistopheles]], the antagonist of the play who is a devil. Doing so he implicitly expressed his favour for the neptunist theory, though he also did so explicitly and sometimes even harshly elsewhere.<ref>{{citation| last=Raman| first=V. V.| title=Ugandan Martyrs and James Hutton| date=June 3, 2002|newspaper=The Global Spiral| volume=6| issue=3| url=http://www.metanexus.net/Magazine/Default.aspx?TabId=68&id=6447&SkinSrc=%5BG%5DSkins%2F_default%2FNo+Skin&ContainerSrc=%5BG%5DContainers%2F_default%2FNo+Container| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070928032113/http://www.metanexus.net/Magazine/Default.aspx?TabId=68&id=6447&SkinSrc=%5BG%5DSkins%2F_default%2FNo+Skin&ContainerSrc=%5BG%5DContainers%2F_default%2FNo+Container| url-status=dead| archive-date=September 28, 2007| access-date=2007-06-19}}</ref> The controversy lasted into the early years of the 19th century, but the works of [[Charles Lyell]] in the 1830s gradually won over support for the uniformitarian ideas of Hutton and the plutonists. However, [[sedimentary rock]]s such as [[limestone]] are considered to have resulted from processes like those described by the neptunists, and so modern theory can be seen as a synthesis of the two approaches.{{according to whom|date=October 2017}}
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Neptunism
(section)
Add topic