Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Jules Richard (mathematician)
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Richard's paradox == {{Main|Richard's Paradox}} The paradox was first stated in 1905 in a letter to Louis Olivier, director of the ''Revue générale des sciences pures et appliquées''. It was published in 1905 in the article ''Les Principes des mathématiques et le problème des ensembles''. The [[Principia Mathematica]] by [[Alfred North Whitehead]] and [[Bertrand Russell]] quote it together with six other paradoxes concerning the problem of self-reference. In one of the most important compendia of mathematical logic, compiled by [[Jean van Heijenoort]], Richard's article is translated into English. The paradox can be interpreted as an application of [[Cantor's diagonal argument]]. It inspired [[Kurt Gödel]] and [[Alan Turing]] to their famous works. Kurt Gödel considered his [[incompleteness theorem]] as analogous to Richard's paradox which, in the '''original version''' runs as follows: Let ''E'' be the set of real numbers that can be defined by a finite number of words. This set is denumerable. Let ''p'' be the ''n''th decimal of the ''n''th number of the set ''E''; we form a number ''N'' having zero for the integral part and ''p'' + 1 for the ''n''th decimal, if ''p'' is not equal either to 8 or 9, and unity in the contrary case. This number ''N'' does not belong to the set ''E'' because it differs from any number of this set, namely from the ''n''th number by the ''n''th digit. But ''N'' has been defined by a finite number of words. It should therefore belong to the set ''E''. That is a contradiction. Richard never presented his paradox in another form, but meanwhile there exist several different versions, some of which being only very loosely connected to the original. For the sake of completeness they may be stated here.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Jules Richard (mathematician)
(section)
Add topic