Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Ideal (ring theory)
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Definitions == Given a [[ring (mathematics)|ring]] {{mvar|R}}, a '''left ideal''' is a subset {{mvar|I}} of {{mvar|R}} that is a [[subgroup]] of the [[additive group]] of <math>R</math> that "absorbs multiplication from the left by elements of {{tmath|1= R }}"; that is, <math>I</math> is a left ideal if it satisfies the following two conditions: # <math>(I,+)</math> is a [[subgroup]] of {{tmath|1= (R,+) }}, # For every <math>r \in R</math> and every {{tmath|1= x \in I }}, the product <math>r x</math> is in {{tmath|1= I }}.<ref>{{harvnb|Dummit|Foote|2004|p=242}}</ref> In other words, a left ideal is a left [[submodule]] of {{mvar|R}}, considered as a [[left module]] over itself.<ref>{{harvnb|Dummit|Foote|2004|loc=Β§ 10.1., Examples (1).}}</ref> A '''right ideal''' is defined similarly, with the condition <math>rx\in I</math> replaced by {{tmath|1= xr\in I }}. A '''two-sided ideal''' is a left ideal that is also a right ideal. If the ring is [[commutative ring|commutative]], the three definitions are the same, and one talks simply of an '''ideal'''. In the non-commutative case, "ideal" is often used instead of "two-sided ideal". If {{mvar|I}} is a left, right or two-sided ideal, the relation <math>x \sim y</math> if and only if :<math>x-y\in I</math> is an [[equivalence relation]] on {{mvar|R}}, and the set of [[equivalence class]]es forms a left, right or bi module denoted <math>R/I</math> and called the ''[[quotient module|quotient]]'' of {{mvar|R}} by {{mvar|I}}.<ref>{{harvnb|Dummit|Foote|2004|loc=Β§ 10.1., Proposition 3.}}</ref> (It is an instance of a [[congruence relation]] and is a generalization of [[modular arithmetic]].) If the ideal {{mvar|I}} is two-sided, <math>R/I</math> is a ring,<ref>{{harvnb|Dummit|Foote|2004|loc=Ch. 7, Proposition 6.}}</ref> and the function :<math>R\to R/I</math> that associates to each element of {{mvar|R}} its equivalence class is a [[surjective]] [[ring homomorphism]] that has the ideal as its [[kernel (algebra)|kernel]].<ref>{{harvnb|Dummit|Foote|2004|loc=Ch. 7, Theorem 7.}}</ref> Conversely, the kernel of a ring homomorphism is a two-sided ideal. Therefore, ''the two-sided ideals are exactly the kernels of ring homomorphisms.'' === Note on convention === By convention, a ring has the multiplicative identity. But some authors do not require a ring to have the multiplicative identity; i.e., for them, a ring is a [[rng (mathematics)|rng]]. For a rng {{mvar|R}}, a '''left ideal''' {{mvar|I}} is a {{not a typo|subrng}} with the additional property that <math>rx</math> is in {{mvar|I}} for every <math>r \in R</math> and every <math>x \in I</math>. (Right and two-sided ideals are defined similarly.) For a ring, an ideal {{mvar|I}} (say a left ideal) is rarely a subring; since a subring shares the same multiplicative identity with the ambient ring {{mvar|R}}, if {{mvar|I}} were a subring, for every <math>r \in R</math>, we have <math>r = r 1 \in I;</math> i.e., <math>I = R</math>. The notion of an ideal does not involve associativity; thus, an ideal is also defined for [[non-associative ring]]s (often without the multiplicative identity) such as a [[Lie algebra]].
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Ideal (ring theory)
(section)
Add topic