Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Iconicity
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==The evolution of language== [[Derek Bickerton]] has posited that iconic signs, both verbal and gestural, were crucial in the evolution of human language. [[Animal communication]] systems, Bickerton has argued, are largely composed of [[Indexicality|indexical]] (and, occasionally, iconic) signs, whereas in human language, "most words are symbolic, and ... without symbolic words we couldn’t have language". The distinction Bickerton draws between these categories is one of [[Displacement (linguistics)|displacement]], with the indexical signs of animal communication systems having no capacity for displacement, and the symbolic signs of human language requiring it. Iconic signs, however, "may or may not have it depending on how they’re used ... iconicity, therefore, is the most probable road that our ancestors took into language". Using a [[Niche construction|niche-construction]] view of human evolution, Bickerton has hypothesized that human ancestors used iconic signs as recruitment signals in the scavenging of dead [[megafauna]]. This process "would have created new words and deployed old words in new contexts, further weakening the uncoupling of words from situations, from current occurrence—even from fitness", and thus allowing for the creation of symbolic language.<ref name="Bickerton (2009)">{{cite book |last=Bickerton |first=Derek |title=Adam's Tongue: How Humans Made Language, How Language Made Humans |year=2009 |publisher=Hill & Wang |location=New York, NY |isbn=9780809022816 |pages=52–53, 218–222}}</ref> In ''[[The Symbolic Species]]'', [[Terrence Deacon]] argues that the emanation of symbolic capacities unique to language was a critical factor in the evolution of the human brain, and that these symbolic capacities are vital to differentiating animal from human forms of communication, processes of learning, and brain anatomy. "The doorway into this virtual world was opened to us alone by the evolution of language, because language is not merely a mode of communication, it is also the outward expression of an unusual mode of thought—symbolic representation."<ref name="Deacon (1997)">{{cite book |last=Deacon |first=Terrence |title=The Symbolic Species: The Co-Evolution of Language and the Human Brain |year=1997 |publisher=Allen Lane the Penguin Press |isbn=978-0-393-03838-5 |chapter=1 |page=[https://archive.org/details/symbolicspeciesc00deac/page/22 22] |chapter-url-access=registration |chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/symbolicspeciesc00deac/page/22 }}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Iconicity
(section)
Add topic