Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Doubly special relativity
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Predictions== {{see also|Modern searches for Lorentz violation}} Experiments to date have not observed contradictions to Special Relativity. It was initially speculated that ordinary special relativity and doubly special relativity would make distinct physical predictions in high-energy processes and, in particular, the derivation of the [[Greisen–Zatsepin–Kuzmin limit|GZK limit]] on energies of [[cosmic ray]]s from distant sources would not be valid. However, it is now established that standard doubly special relativity does not predict any suppression of the GZK cutoff, contrary to the models where an [[preferred frame|absolute local rest frame]] exists, such as [[effective field theory|effective field theories]] like the [[Standard-Model Extension]]. Since DSR generically (though not necessarily) implies an energy-dependence of the speed of light, it has further been predicted that, if there are modifications to first order in energy over the Planck mass, this energy-dependence would be observable in high energetic [[photon]]s reaching Earth from distant [[gamma ray burst]]s. Depending on whether the now energy-dependent speed of light increases or decreases with energy (a model-dependent feature), highly energetic photons would be faster or slower than the lower energetic ones.<ref name="Smolin2009"> {{Cite journal |last1=Amelino-Camelia |first1=Giovanni |last2=Smolin |first2=Lee |year=2009 |title=Prospects for constraining quantum gravity dispersion with near term observations |journal=[[Physical Review D]] |volume=80 |issue=8 |pages=084017 |arxiv=0906.3731 |bibcode=2009PhRvD..80h4017A |doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.80.084017 |s2cid=9533538}}</ref> However, the [[Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope|Fermi-LAT]] experiment in 2009 measured a 31 GeV photon, which nearly simultaneously arrived with other photons from the same burst, which excluded such dispersion effects even above the Planck energy.<ref name=lat>{{cite journal |author=Fermi LAT Collaboration|title=A limit on the variation of the speed of light arising from quantum gravity effects|journal=Nature|volume=462|issue=7271 |year=2009|pages=331–334|doi=10.1038/nature08574|arxiv=0908.1832|pmid=19865083 |bibcode = 2009Natur.462..331A |s2cid=205218977}}</ref> Moreover, it has been argued that DSR, with an energy-dependent speed of light, is inconsistent and first order effects are ruled out already because they would lead to non-local particle interactions that would long have been observed in particle physics experiments.<ref name="Hossenfelder2009"> {{cite arXiv |first=S. |last=Hossenfelder |title=The Box-Problem in Deformed Special Relativity |year=2009 |eprint=0912.0090 |class=gr-qc }}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Doubly special relativity
(section)
Add topic