Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
De Havilland Comet
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Origins=== [[File:Design Studies for the DH 106 Comet.jpg|thumb|upright=1.7|Design studies for the DH.106 Comet 1944β1947 (artist's impression)]] On 11 March 1943, the [[Cabinet of the United Kingdom]] formed the [[Brabazon Committee]], which was tasked with determining the UK's airliner needs after the conclusion of the [[Second World War]].<ref name=TH88>Trischler and Helmuth 2003, p. 88.</ref> One of its recommendations was for the development and production of a pressurised, transatlantic mailplane that could carry {{cvt|1|LT|lb kg}} of payload at a cruising speed of {{cvt|400|mph}} non-stop.<ref name=Birtles124>Birtles 1970, p. 124.</ref> Aviation company [[de Havilland]] was interested in this requirement, but chose to challenge the then widely held view that [[jet engine]]s were too fuel-hungry and unreliable for such a role.{{refn|During the same era, both Lockheed with their [[Lockheed L-188 Electra]] and Vickers with the ground-breaking [[Vickers Viscount]] discounted the advantages of "pure" jet power to develop [[turboprop]]-powered airliners.<ref>Kodera et al. 2010, p. 16.</ref>|group=N}} As a result, committee member Sir [[Geoffrey de Havilland]], head of the de Havilland company, used his personal influence and his company's expertise to champion the development of a jet-propelled aircraft; proposing a specification for a pure [[turbojet]]-powered design.<ref name=TH88/> The committee accepted the proposal, calling it the "Type IV" (of five designs),{{refn|The "Type IV" Specifications issued on 3 February 1943 provided for a "high-speed mail-carrying airliner, gas-turbine powered."<ref name=Jones60>Jones 2010, p. 60.</ref>|group=N}} and in 1945 awarded a development and production contract to de Havilland under the designation ''Type 106''. The type and design were to be so advanced that de Havilland had to undertake the design and development of ''both'' the airframe and the engines. This was because in 1945 no turbojet engine manufacturer in the world was drawing-up a design specification for an engine with the thrust and [[thrust specific fuel consumption|specific fuel consumption]] that could power an aircraft at the proposed cruising altitude ({{cvt|40000|ft}}), speed, and transatlantic range as was called for by the Type 106.<ref>Jackson 1988, p. 453.</ref> First-phase development of the DH.106 focused on short- and intermediate-range mailplanes with small passenger compartments and as few as six seats, before being redefined as a long-range airliner with a capacity of 24 seats.<ref name=Birtles124/> Out of all the Brabazon designs, the DH.106 was seen as the riskiest: both in terms of introducing untried design elements and for the financial commitment involved.<ref name=TH88/> Nevertheless, the [[British Overseas Airways Corporation]] (BOAC) found the Type IV's specifications attractive, and initially proposed a purchase of 25 aircraft; in December 1945, when a firm contract was created, the order total was revised to 10.<ref name=Jones62>Jones 2010, p. 62.</ref> {{Quote box|align=left|width=21%|quote=During the next few years, the UK has an opportunity, which may not recur, of developing aircraft manufacture as one of our main export industries. On whether we grasp this opportunity and so establish firmly an industry of the utmost strategic and economic importance, our future as a great nation may depend.|source=<small>[[Duncan Sandys]], Minister of Supply, 1952.<ref name=TH90/></small>}} A design team was formed in 1946 under the leadership of chief designer [[Ronald Eric Bishop|Ronald Bishop]], who had been responsible for the [[de Havilland Mosquito|Mosquito]] fighter-bomber.<ref name=Jones62/> Several unorthodox configurations were considered, ranging from [[Canard (aeronautics)|canard]] to [[Tailless aircraft|tailless]] designs;{{refn|From 1944 to 1946, the design group prepared submissions on a three-engined twin-boom design, a three-engined canard design with engines mounted in the rear, and a tailless design that featured a [[swept wing]] and four "[[podded engine|podded]]" engines.<ref name=Jones62/>|group=N}} All were rejected. The [[Ministry of Supply]] was interested in the most radical of the proposed designs, and ordered two experimental tailless [[de Havilland DH 108|DH 108]]s{{refn|The Ministry of Supply's order for DH 108s was listed as Operational Requirement OR207 to Specification E.18/45.<ref name=watkins39/>|group=N}} to serve as [[proof of concept]] aircraft for testing swept-wing configurations in both low-speed and high-speed flight.<ref name=Birtles124/><ref name=watkins39>Watkins 1996, p. 39.</ref> During flight tests, the DH 108 gained a reputation for being accident-prone and unstable, leading de Havilland and BOAC to gravitate to conventional configurations and, necessarily, designs with less technical risk.<ref>Darling 2001, p. 11.</ref> The DH 108s were later modified to test the DH.106's power controls.<ref name=Birtles125/> In September 1946, before completion of the DH 108s, BOAC requests necessitated a redesign of the DH.106 from its previous 24-seat configuration to a larger 36-seat version.<ref name=Birtles124/>{{refn|BOAC's requested capacity increase was known as Specification 22/46.<ref name=Birtles124/>|group=N}} With no time to develop the technology necessary for a proposed tailless configuration, Bishop opted for a more conventional 20-degree swept-wing design{{refn|The wing was drastically redesigned from a 40Λ sweep.<ref name=Jones62β63/>|group=N}} with unswept tail surfaces, married to an enlarged fuselage accommodating 36 passengers in a four-abreast arrangement with a central aisle.<ref name=Winchester109/> Replacing previously specified [[de Havilland Goblin|Halford H.1 Goblin]] engines, four new, more-powerful [[Rolls-Royce Avon]]s were to be incorporated in pairs buried in the wing roots; [[de Havilland Ghost|Halford H.2 Ghost]] engines were eventually applied as an interim solution while the Avons cleared certification. The redesigned aircraft was named the DH.106 ''Comet'' in December 1947.{{refn|The name "Comet", previously used by the [[de Havilland DH.88]] racing aircraft, was revived.<ref>Jackson 1988, p. 356.</ref>|group=N}} Revised first orders from BOAC and [[British South American Airways]]{{refn|British South American Airways merged with BOAC in 1949.<ref name=Birtles124/>|group=N}} totalled 14 aircraft, with delivery projected for 1952.<ref name=Jones62β63>Jones 2010, pp. 62β63.</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
De Havilland Comet
(section)
Add topic