Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Cross-examination
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Affecting the outcome of jury trials == Cross-examination is a key component of a [[trial]] and the topic is given substantial attention during courses on [[trial advocacy]].<ref>Lubet, Steven; ''[[iarchive:moderntrialadvoc0000lube m2d0|Modern Trial Advocacy]]'', NITA, New York, NY 2004 pp. 83 et. seq. {{ISBN|1556818866}}</ref> The opinions of a [[jury]] or judge are often changed if cross-examination casts doubt on the witness. On the other hand, a credible witness may reinforce the substance of their original statements and enhance the judge's or jury's belief. Though the [[closing argument]] is often considered the deciding moment of a trial, effective cross-examination wins trials.<ref>{{cite book |title=Relentless Criminal Cross-Examination|last=Mahoney|first=Kevin J|location=Costa Mesa, California|publisher=James Publishing|year=2008|isbn=978-1580121255}}</ref> Attorneys anticipate hostile witnesses' responses during pretrial planning, and often attempt to shape the witnesses' perception of the questions to draw out information helpful to the attorney's case.<ref>Dreier, A.S.; ''Strategy, Planning & Litigating to Win''; Conatus, Boston, MA, 2012, pp. 79-85; {{ISBN|0615676952}}</ref> Typically during an attorney's closing argument, they will repeat any admissions made by witnesses that favor their case. In the United States, cross-examination is seen as a core part of the entire [[adversarial system]] of justice, in that it "is the principal means by which the believability of a witness and the truth of his testimony are tested."<ref>''Davis v. Alaska'', {{ussc|415|308|1974}}.</ref> Another key component affecting a trial outcome is [[jury selection]], in which attorneys will attempt to include jurors from whom they feel they can get a favorable response or at the least an unbiased fair decision. So while there are many factors affecting the outcome of a trial, the cross-examination of a witness will often influence an open-minded unbiased jury searching for the certainty of facts upon which to base their decision.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Cross-examination
(section)
Add topic