Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Council of Chalcedon
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Background== In 325, the first ecumenical council ([[First Council of Nicaea]]) determined that Jesus Christ was God, "[[consubstantiality|consubstantial]]" with the Father, and rejected the [[Arianism|Arian contention]] that Jesus was a created being. This was reaffirmed at the [[First Council of Constantinople]] (381) and the [[First Council of Ephesus]] (431). ===Eutychian controversy=== {{Main|Eutyches}} About two years after [[Cyril of Alexandria]]'s death in 444, an aged [[monk]] from Constantinople named [[Eutyches]] began teaching a subtle variation on the traditional Christology in an attempt to stop what he saw as a new outbreak of [[Nestorianism]].<ref name=EB>{{Cite web|url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/Eutyches|title=Eutyches | Biography, Eutychianism, Beliefs, & Facts|website=Encyclopedia Britannica}}</ref> He claimed to be a faithful follower of Cyril's teaching, which was declared orthodox in the Union of 433. Cyril had taught that "There is only one ''physis'', since it is the Incarnation, of God the Word." It was argued by [[Pope Leo I]] that due to potential ambiguity between the various Greek terms and their Latin equivalents, in addition to the energy and imprudence with which he asserted his opinions, Eutyches was misunderstood, and many believed that he was advocating [[Docetism]], a sort of reversal of [[Arianism]] β where Arius had denied the [[consubstantial]] divinity of [[Jesus]], Eutyches seemed to be denying that Jesus was fully human.<ref name=EB/> [[Pope Leo I]] wrote that Eutyches' error seemed to be more from a lack of skill than from malice. Eutyches had been accusing various personages of covert Nestorianism. In November 448, [[Flavian of Constantinople|Flavian, Bishop of Constantinople]] held a local synod regarding a point of discipline connected with the province of [[Sardis]]. At the end of the session of this synod one of those inculpated, [[Eusebius of Dorylaeum|Eusebius, Bishop of Dorylaeum]], brought a counter charge of heresy against the [[archimandrite]].<ref>{{citation-attribution|1=[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05631a.htm Chapman, John. "Eutyches." The Catholic Encyclopedia] Vol. 5. New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1909. 6 February 2019}}</ref> Eusebius demanded that Eutyches be removed from office. Flavian preferred that the bishop and the archimandrite sort out their differences, but as his suggestion went unheeded, Eutyches was summoned to clarify his position regarding the nature of Christ. Eventually, Eutyches reluctantly appeared, but his position was considered to be theologically unsophisticated, and the synod finding his answers unresponsive condemned and exiled him.<ref name=EB/> Flavian sent a full account to Pope Leo I. Although it had been accidentally delayed, Leo wrote a compendious explanation of the whole doctrine involved, and sent it to Flavian as a formal and authoritative decision of the question.<ref name=chapman>[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05019a.htm Chapman, John. "Dioscurus." The Catholic Encyclopedia] Vol. 5. New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1909. 8 February 2019</ref> Eutyches appealed against the decision, labeling Flavian a Nestorian, and received the support of [[Pope Dioscorus I of Alexandria]]. [[John Anthony McGuckin]] sees an "innate rivalry" between the Sees of Alexandria and Constantinople.<ref>McGuckin, John Anthony. ''St. Cyril of Alexandria: The Christological Controversy''. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1994. p. 12 {{ISBN|9789004099906}}</ref> Dioscurus, imitating his predecessors in assuming a primacy over Constantinople, held his own synod which annulled the sentence of Flavian, and absolved Eutyches after he claimed to have repented. ===Latrocinium of Ephesus=== {{Main|Second Council of Ephesus}} Through the influence of the court official Chrysaphius, godson of Eutyches, in 449, the competing claims between the Patriarchs of Constantinople and Alexandria led Emperor [[Theodosius II]] to call a [[Second Council of Ephesus|council]] which was held in [[Ephesus]] in 449,<ref>{{Cite book|last=Hughes|first=Philip|title=A Popular History of the Catholic Church|publisher=Image Books (Doubleday)|year=1954|location=Garden City, New York|page=37}}</ref> with Dioscorus presiding. Pope Leo sent four legates to represent him and expressed his regret that the shortness of the notice must prevent the presence of any other bishop of the West.<ref name=chapman/> He provided his legates, one of whom died en route, with a letter addressed to Flavian explaining Rome's position in the controversy. Leo's letter, now known as [[Leo's Tome]], confessed that Christ had two natures, and was not of or from two natures.<ref name="SevenCouncils">{{cite web |url=http://www.ccel.org/fathers2/NPNF2-14/Npnf2-14-59.htm#P3825_663549 |title=NPNF2-14. The Seven Ecumenical Councils | Christian Classics Ethereal Library |publisher=Ccel.org |date=2005-06-01 |access-date=2013-08-25}}</ref> On August 8, 449 the [[Second Council of Ephesus]] began its first session. The Acts of the first session of this synod were read at the Council of Chalcedon, 451, and are thus preserved. The remainder of the Acts (the first session being wanting) are known through a Syriac translation by a Miaphysite monk, written in the year 535 and published from a manuscript in the British Museum.<ref name=jchap>[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05495a.htm Chapman, John. "Robber Council of Ephesus." The Catholic Encyclopedia] Vol. 5. New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1909. 9 February 2019</ref> Nonetheless, there are somewhat different interpretations as to what actually transpired. The question before the council by order of the emperor was whether Flavian, in a synod held by him at Constantinople in November, 448, had justly deposed and excommunicated the Archimandrite Eutyches for refusing to admit two natures in Christ. Dioscorus began the council by banning all members of the November 448 synod which had deposed Eutyches from sitting as judges. He then introduced Eutyches who publicly professed that while Christ had two natures before the incarnation, the two natures had merged to form a single nature after the incarnation. Of the 130 assembled bishops, 111 voted to rehabilitate Eutyches.{{citation needed|date=December 2024}} Throughout these proceedings, [[Pope Hilarius|Hilary]] (one of the papal legates) repeatedly called for the reading of Leo's Tome, but was ignored. The Eastern Orthodox Church has very different accounts of The Second Council of Ephesus. Pope Dioscorus requested deferring reading of Leo's Tome, as it was not seen as necessary to start with, and could be read later. This was seen as a rebuke to the representatives from the Church of Rome not reading the Tome from the start. Not having wanted for the [[Leo's Tome|letter]] to be read aloud for this reason, Dioscorus was then forced to depose Flavian of Constantinople and Eusebius of Dorylaeum on the grounds that they taught the Word having two distinct hypostases, in contrast to Cyril's teachings. According to Chalcedonian accounts, when Flavian and Hilary objected, Dioscorus called for a mob to enter the church which assaulted Flavian as he clung to the altar; other accounts blame one monk, [[Barsauma (died 456)|Barsauma]], and others yet blame Dioscorus himself. Flavian would die three days later. Other sources, however, implicate [[Pulcheria|Empress Pulcheria]] and [[Anatolius of Constantinople]],<ref>{{Cite book |last=Center for the Preservation of Ancient Religious Texts |first=B. Y. U. |url=https://archive.org/details/DriverHodgson1925TheBazaarOfHeracleides |title=The Bazaar Of Heracleides |pages=343, 362 |language=English}}</ref> as it would not be realistic for a murder witnessed by many bishops and patriarchs at a major council to go unmentioned, and Flavian himself has letters to Leo ''after'' the council that make no mention of such events.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Flavian - Appeal to Leo |url=https://www.earlychurchtexts.com/public/flavian_appeal_to_leo.htm |access-date=2025-05-11 |website=www.earlychurchtexts.com}}</ref> The papal legates refused to attend the second session at which several more bishops were deposed, including Ibas of Edessa, Irenaeus of Tyre, Domnus of Antioch, and Theodoret. Dioscorus then had Cyril of Alexandria's Twelve Anathemas declared orthodox<ref>[[Frend, W. H. C.]], ''The Rise of the Monophysite Movement'', Cambridge University Press, 1972, pp. 41β43</ref> with the intent of condemning any confession other than Cyril's one-nature formula. According to a letter to the Empress [[Pulcheria]] collected among the letters of Leo I, Hilary apologized for not delivering to her the pope's letter after the synod, but owing to Dioscurus, who tried to hinder his going either to Rome or to Constantinople, he had great difficulty in making his escape in order to bring to the pontiff the news of the result of the council.<ref>[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07348b.htm Kirsch, Johann Peter. "Pope Saint Hilarus." The Catholic Encyclopedia] Vol. 7. New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1910. 9 February 2019</ref> Hilary, who later became pope and dedicated an oratory in the [[Lateran Basilica]] in thanks for his life,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.cfpeople.org/Books/Pope/POPEp46.htm |title=St. Hilary |access-date=2009-11-09 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100613053629/http://cfpeople.org/Books/Pope/POPEp46.htm |archive-date=2010-06-13 }}</ref> managed to escape from Constantinople and brought news of the council to Leo who immediately dubbed it a "synod of robbers"{{snd}}[[Latrocinium]]{{snd}}and refused to accept its pronouncements. The decisions of this council now threatened [[Schism (religion)|schism]] between the East and the West. The claims that bishops being forced to approve actions, were challenged by Pope Dioscorus and the Egyptian Bishops at Chalcedon.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Council of Chalcedon
(section)
Add topic