Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Chambers v. Florida
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Decision== On February 13, 1940, the court delivered its ruling. The opinion of the court was delivered by Justice [[Hugo Black]] of [[Alabama]]. This was Marshall's first<ref>{{cite web |title=Thurgood Marshall Biography (1908β1993) |url=https://www.biography.com/law-figure/thurgood-marshall |website=The Biography.com website |publisher=A&E Television Networks |access-date=January 22, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210120044213/https://www.biography.com/law-figure/thurgood-marshall |archive-date=January 20, 2021 |date=January 11, 2021}}</ref> of many triumphs in front of the nation's highest tribunal; the Court ruled in favor of the defendants, and overturned their convictions. The court found that on the facts admitted by the police and sheriff's officers, the confessions had clearly been compelled and were therefore inadmissible. It marked one of the first times that the court had accepted the contention that treatment short of physical violence should result in the suppression of evidence. Several of the features of this case, such as not allowing defendants to contact anyone, holding them without formal charges or arraignment, and denying them counsel during questioning were common tactics{{where|date=July 2019}} in law enforcement at the time{{citation needed|date=July 2019}} and were eventually rejected by the court in ''[[Miranda v. Arizona]]'' (1966), a case in which Marshall argued on behalf of the United States government as [[Solicitor General of the United States]].<ref>See appearances of counsel listing in Miranda decision.</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Chambers v. Florida
(section)
Add topic