Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Cantor's diagonal argument
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Real numbers === The uncountability of the [[real number]]s was already established by [[Cantor's first uncountability proof]], but it also follows from the above result. To prove this, an [[injective function|injection]] will be constructed from the set ''T'' of infinite binary strings to the set '''R''' of real numbers. Since ''T'' is uncountable, the [[Image (mathematics)|image]] of this function, which is a subset of '''R''', is uncountable. Therefore, '''R''' is uncountable. Also, by using a method of construction devised by Cantor, a [[bijection]] will be constructed between ''T'' and '''R'''. Therefore, ''T'' and '''R''' have the same cardinality, which is called the "[[cardinality of the continuum]]" and is usually denoted by <math>\mathfrak{c}</math> or <math>2^{\aleph_0}</math>. An injection from ''T'' to '''R''' is given by mapping binary strings in ''T'' to [[decimal fractions]], such as mapping ''t'' = 0111... to the decimal 0.0111.... This function, defined by {{nowrap|''f''{{space|hair}}(''t'') {{=}} 0.''t''}}, is an injection because it maps different strings to different numbers.<ref group=note>While 0.0111... and 0.1000... would be equal if interpreted as binary fractions (destroying injectivity), they are different when interpreted as decimal fractions, as is done by ''f''. On the other hand, since ''t'' is a binary string, the equality 0.0999... = 0.1000... of decimal fractions is not relevant here.</ref> Constructing a bijection between ''T'' and '''R''' is slightly more complicated. Instead of mapping 0111... to the decimal 0.0111..., it can be mapped to the [[radix|base]]-''b'' number: 0.0111...<sub>''b''</sub>. This leads to the family of functions: {{nowrap|''f''<sub>''b''</sub>{{space|hair}}(''t'') {{=}} 0.''t''<sub>''b''</sub>}}. The functions {{nowrap|''f''{{space|hair}}<sub>''b''</sub>(''t'')}} are injections, except for {{nowrap|''f''{{space|hair}}<sub>2</sub>(''t'')}}. This function will be modified to produce a bijection between ''T'' and '''R'''. {| class="wikitable collapsible collapsed" ! Construction of a bijection between ''T'' and '''R''' |- style="text-align: left; vertical-align: top" | {{multiple image|total_width=200|image1=Linear transformation svg.svg|width1=106|height1=159|caption1=The function ''h'': (0,1) β (βΟ/2, Ο/2)|image2=Tangent one period.svg|width2=338|height2=580|caption2=The function tan: (βΟ/2, Ο/2) β '''R'''}} This construction uses a method devised by Cantor that was published in 1878. He used it to construct a bijection between the [[closed interval]] [0, 1] and the [[irrational number|irrational]]s in the [[open interval]] (0, 1). He first removed a [[countably infinite]] subset from each of these sets so that there is a bijection between the remaining uncountable sets. Since there is a bijection between the countably infinite subsets that have been removed, combining the two bijections produces a bijection between the original sets.<ref>See page 254 of {{Citation|author=Georg Cantor|title=Ein Beitrag zur Mannigfaltigkeitslehre|url=http://www.digizeitschriften.de/dms/img/?PID=GDZPPN002156806|volume=84|pages=242–258|journal=Journal fΓΌr die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik|year=1878}}. This proof is discussed in {{Citation|author=Joseph Dauben|title=Georg Cantor: His Mathematics and Philosophy of the Infinite|publisher=Harvard University Press|year=1979|isbn=0-674-34871-0}}, pp. 61–62, 65. On page 65, Dauben proves a result that is stronger than Cantor's. He lets "''Ο<sub>Ξ½</sub>'' denote any sequence of rationals in [0, 1]." Cantor lets ''Ο<sub>Ξ½</sub>'' denote a sequence [[Enumeration|enumerating]] the rationals in [0, 1], which is the kind of sequence needed for his construction of a bijection between [0, 1] and the irrationals in (0, 1).</ref> Cantor's method can be used to modify the function {{nowrap|''f''{{space|hair}}<sub>2</sub>(''t'') {{=}} 0.''t''<sub>2</sub>}} to produce a bijection from ''T'' to (0, 1). Because some numbers have two binary expansions, {{nowrap|''f''{{space|hair}}<sub>2</sub>(''t'')}} is not even [[injective function|injective]]. For example, {{nowrap|''f''{{space|hair}}<sub>2</sub>(1000...) {{=}}}} 0.1000...<sub>2</sub> = 1/2 and {{nowrap|''f''{{space|hair}}<sub>2</sub>(0111...) {{=}}}} 0.0111...<sub>2</sub> = {{nowrap|[[Infinite series|1/4 + 1/8 + 1/16 + ...]] {{=}}}} 1/2, so both 1000... and 0111... map to the same number, 1/2. To modify {{nowrap|''f''<sub>2</sub>{{space|hair}}(''t'')}}, observe that it is a bijection except for a countably infinite subset of (0, 1) and a countably infinite subset of ''T''. It is not a bijection for the numbers in (0, 1) that have two [[binary expansion]]s. These are called [[dyadic rational|dyadic]] numbers and have the form {{nowrap|''m''{{space|hair}}/{{space|hair}}2<sup>''n''</sup>}} where ''m'' is an odd integer and ''n'' is a natural number. Put these numbers in the sequence: ''r'' = (1/2, 1/4, 3/4, 1/8, 3/8, 5/8, 7/8, ...). Also, {{nowrap|''f''<sub>2</sub>{{space|hair}}(''t'')}} is not a bijection to (0, 1) for the strings in ''T'' appearing after the [[binary point]] in the binary expansions of 0, 1, and the numbers in sequence ''r''. Put these eventually-constant strings in the sequence: ''s'' = ({{color|#808080|000}}..., {{color|#808080|111}}..., 1{{color|#808080|000}}..., 0{{color|#808080|111}}..., 01{{color|#808080|000}}..., 00{{color|#808080|111}}..., 11{{color|#808080|000}}..., 10{{color|#808080|111}}..., ...). Define the bijection ''g''(''t'') from ''T'' to (0, 1): If ''t'' is the ''n''<sup>th</sup> string in sequence ''s'', let ''g''(''t'') be the ''n''<sup>th</sup> number in sequence ''r''{{space|hair}}; otherwise, ''g''(''t'') = 0.''t''<sub>2</sub>. To construct a bijection from ''T'' to '''R''', start with the [[trigonometric functions|tangent function]] tan(''x''), which is a bijection from (βΟ/2, Ο/2) to '''R''' (see the figure shown on the right). Next observe that the [[linear function]] ''h''(''x'') = {{nowrap|Ο''x'' β Ο/2}} is a bijection from (0, 1) to (βΟ/2, Ο/2) (see the figure shown on the left). The [[function composition|composite function]] tan(''h''(''x'')) = {{nowrap|tan(Ο''x'' β Ο/2)}} is a bijection from (0, 1) to '''R'''. Composing this function with ''g''(''t'') produces the function tan(''h''(''g''(''t''))) = {{nowrap|tan(Ο''g''(''t'') β Ο/2)}}, which is a bijection from ''T'' to '''R'''. |}
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Cantor's diagonal argument
(section)
Add topic