Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Axiom of extensionality
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== In ZF set theory == In the [[formal language]] of the Zermelo–Fraenkel axioms, the axiom reads: :<math>\forall x\forall y \, [\forall z \, (\left.z \in x\right. \leftrightarrow \left. z \in y\right.) \rightarrow x=y]</math><ref name=":1">{{Cite web |title=Set Theory > Zermelo-Fraenkel Set Theory (ZF) (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/set-theory/ZF.html |access-date=2024-11-24 |website=plato.stanford.edu |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Zermelo-Fraenkel Set Theory |url=https://www.cs.odu.edu/~toida/nerzic/content/set/ZFC.html |access-date=2024-11-24 |website=www.cs.odu.edu}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Naive Set Theory |url=https://sites.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/teaching/paradox/chapters/sets/sets.html |access-date=2024-11-24 |website=sites.pitt.edu}}</ref> or in words: :If the sets <math>x</math> and <math>y</math> have the same members, then they are the same set.<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":0" /> In {{glossary link|pure set theory|glossary=Glossary of set theory}}, all members of sets are themselves sets, but not in set theory with [[urelement]]s. The axiom's usefulness can be seen from the fact that, if one accepts that <math>\exists A \, \forall x \, (x \in A \iff \Phi(x))</math>, where <math>A</math> is a set and ''<math>\Phi(x)</math>'' is a formula that <math>x</math> [[Free variables and bound variables|occurs free]] in but <math>A</math> doesn't, then the axiom assures that there is a unique set <math>A</math> whose members are precisely whatever objects (urelements or sets, as the case may be) satisfy the formula ''<math>\Phi(x)</math>.'' The converse of the axiom, <math>\forall x\forall y \, [x=y \rightarrow \forall z \, (\left.z \in x\right. \leftrightarrow \left. z \in y\right.)]</math>, follows from the [[First-order logic#Equality and its axioms|substitution property]] of [[equality (mathematics)|equality]]. Despite this, the axiom is sometimes given directly as a [[Logical biconditional|biconditional]], i.e., as <math>\forall x\forall y \, [\forall z \, (\left.z \in x\right. \leftrightarrow \left. z \in y\right.) \leftrightarrow x=y]</math>.<ref name=":0" />
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Axiom of extensionality
(section)
Add topic