Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Soul
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Aristotle=== {{See also|Aristotle's biology}} [[File:Aristotelian Soul.png|thumb|upright=1.5|The structure of the souls of plants, animals, and humans, according to [[Aristotle]], with ''Bios'', ''Zoê'', and ''Psūchê'']] [[Aristotle]] defined the soul, or ''Psūchê'' (ψυχή), as the "[[first actuality]]" of a naturally organized body,<ref>{{cite book|last=Aristotle|title=On The Soul|page=412b5}}</ref> and argued against its separate existence from the physical body. In Aristotle's view, the primary activity, or full actualization, of a living thing constitutes its soul. For example, the full actualization of an eye, as an independent organism, is to see (its purpose or [[final cause]]).<ref>{{cite book |last=Aristotle |title=Physics |at=Book VIII, Chapter 5, pp. 256a5–22}}</ref> Another example is that the full actualization of a human being would be living a fully functional human life in accordance with reason (which he considered to be a faculty unique to humanity).<ref>{{cite book |last=Aristotle |title=Nicomachean Ethics |at=Book I, Chapter 7, pp. 1098a7–17}}</ref> For Aristotle, the soul is the organization of the form and matter of a natural being which allows it to strive for its full actualization. This organization between form and matter is necessary for any activity, or functionality, to be possible in a natural being. Using an artifact (non-natural being) as an example, a house is a building for human habituation but for a house to be actualized requires the material, such as wood, nails, or bricks necessary for its actuality (i.e., being a fully functional house); however, this does not imply that a house has a soul. In regards to artifacts, the source of motion that is required for their full actualization is outside of themselves (for example, a builder builds a house). In natural beings, this source of motion is contained within the being itself.<ref>{{cite book |last=Aristotle |title=Physics |at=Book III, Chapter 1, pp. 201a10–25}}</ref> Aristotle addressed the faculties of the soul. The various [[faculties of the soul]], such as nutrition, movement (peculiar to animals), reason (peculiar to humans), sensation (special, common, and incidental), and so forth, when exercised, constitute the "second actuality", or fulfillment, of the capacity to be alive. For example, someone who falls asleep, as opposed to someone who falls dead, can wake up and live their life, while the latter can no longer do so. Aristotle identified three hierarchical levels of natural beings: plants, animals, and people, having three different degrees of soul: ''Bios'' ('life'), ''Zoë'' ('animate life'), and ''Psuchë'' ('self-conscious life'). For these groups, he identified three corresponding levels of soul, or biological activity: the nutritive activity of growth, sustenance and reproduction which all life shares (''Bios''); the self-willed motive activity and sensory faculties, which only animals and people have in common (''Zoë''); and finally "reason", of which humans alone are capable (''Pseuchë''). Aristotle's discussion of the soul is in his work, ''De Anima'' (''[[On the Soul]]'').<ref>{{Cite book |last=Aristotle |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=quCipxLxEzwC |title=De Anima |date=2008-12-01 |publisher=Cosimo, Inc. |isbn=978-1-60520-432-1 |language=en}}</ref> Although mostly seen as opposing Plato in regard to the immortality of the soul,<ref name="auto">Goetz, S. (2016) Soul. In Vocabulary for the stury of religion Brill</ref> a controversy can be found in relation to the fifth chapter of the third book: in this text both interpretations can be argued for, soul as a whole can be deemed mortal, and a part called "active intellect" or "active mind" is immortal and eternal.<ref>{{cite book |last=Aristotle |title=On The Soul |at=Book III, Chapter 5, pp. 430a24–25}}</ref> Advocates exist for both sides of the controversy; it is argued that there will be permanent disagreement about its final conclusions, as no other [[Aristotelianism|Aristotelian]] text contains this specific point, and this part of ''De Anima'' is obscure.<ref>{{cite book |chapter-url=http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-psychology/active-mind.html |title=Aristotle's Psychology |chapter=supplement: The Active Mind of De Anima iii 5) |access-date=2013-12-12 |last=Shields |first=Christopher |author-link=Christopher Shields |year=2011 |publisher=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy}}</ref> Furthermore, Aristotle states that the soul helps humans find the truth, and understanding the true purpose or role of the soul is extremely difficult.<ref>{{cite book |title=Introduction to Aristotle |last=Smith |first=J. S. (Trans) |publisher=University of Chicago Press |year=1973 |location=Chicago |pages=155–59}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Soul
(section)
Add topic