Editing Peasants' Revolt (section)

===Aftermath===
[[File:Richard II King of England.jpg|thumb|upright=1.4|alt=Medieval painting|Late 14th-century portrait of [[Richard II of England|Richard II]], now in [[Westminster Abbey]]]]

The royal government and Parliament began to re-establish the normal processes of government after the revolt; as the historian [[Michael Postan]] describes, the uprising was in many ways a "passing episode".<ref>{{harvnb|Postan|1975|p=172}};{{harvnb|Tuck|1987|p=212}}</ref> On 30 June, the King ordered England's serfs to return to their previous conditions of service, and on 2 July the royal charters signed under duress during the rising were formally revoked.<ref name=Dunn2002P136/> Parliament met in November to discuss the events of the year and how best to respond to their challenges.<ref>{{harvnb|Dunn|2002|pp=141–142}}</ref> The revolt was blamed on the misconduct of royal officials, who, it was argued, had been excessively greedy and overbearing.<ref>{{harvnb|Tuck|1987|pp=205–206}}</ref> The Commons stood behind the existing labour laws, but requested changes in the royal council, which Richard granted.<ref>{{harvnb|Dunn|2002|p=142}}</ref> Richard also granted general pardons to those who had executed rebels without due process, to all men who had remained loyal, and to all those who had rebelled&nbsp;– with the exception of the men of Bury St Edmunds, any men who had been involved in the killing of the King's advisers, and those who were still on the run from prison.<ref>{{harvnb|Dunn|2002|pp=142–143}}</ref>

Despite the violence of the suppression, the government and local lords were relatively circumspect in restoring order after the revolt, and continued to be worried about fresh revolts for several decades.<ref>{{harvnb|Hilton|1995|p=231}}; {{harvnb|Tuck|1987|p=210}}</ref> Few lords took revenge on their peasants except through the legal processes of the courts.<ref>{{harvnb|Tuck|1987|p=201}}</ref> Low-level unrest continued for several more years.<ref>{{harvnb|Rubin|2006|p=127}}</ref> In September 1382 there was trouble in Norfolk, involving an apparent plot against the Bishop of Norwich, and in March the following year there was an investigation into a plot to kill the [[sheriff of Devon]].<ref>{{harvnb|Eiden|1999|p=370}}; {{harvnb|Rubin|2006|p=127}}</ref> When negotiating rents with their landlords, peasants alluded to the memory of the revolt and the threat of violence.<ref name="Dyer 2009 291">{{harvnb|Dyer|2009|p=291}}</ref>

There were no further attempts by Parliament to impose a poll tax or to reform England's fiscal system.<ref>{{harvnb|Tuck|1987|pp=203–205}}</ref> The Commons instead concluded at the end of 1381 that the military effort on the Continent should be "carefully but substantially reduced".<ref>{{harvnb|Sumption|2009|p=430}}</ref> Unable to raise fresh taxes, the government had to curtail its foreign policy and military expeditions and began to examine the options for peace.<ref>{{harvnb|Tuck|1987|pp=208–209}}; {{harvnb|Sumption|2009|p=430}}</ref> The institution of [[serfdom]] declined after 1381, but primarily for economic rather than political reasons.<ref>{{harvnb|Dunn|2002|p=147}}</ref> Rural wages continued to increase, and lords increasingly sold their serfs' freedom in exchange for cash, or converted traditional forms of tenure to new [[leasehold]] arrangements.<ref>{{harvnb|Dunn|2002|p=147}}; {{harvnb|Hilton|1995|p=232}}</ref> During the 15th century serfdom vanished in England.<ref name="Dyer 2009 291"/>