Editing Ordo Templi Orientis (section)

===Court cases===
In Australia in 2005, O.T.O. began a defamation case against the site GaiaGuys for material put up on their website that directly accused O.T.O., particularly in Australia, of participating in acts of child abuse and sacrifice. The court found in favour of O.T.O.<ref>Boswell, Alex. [http://www.lawyersweekly.com.au/articles/32/0c047b32.asp Pro bono effort muzzles religion slur] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070711150703/http://www.lawyersweekly.com.au/articles/32/0c047b32.asp |date=2007-07-11 }} in ''Lawyers Weekly'', 6 December 2006</ref>

In June 2008, O.T.O. won a trademark case on appeal in the UK: "OTO", "O.T.O." "Ordo Templi Orientis" and the OTO Lamen were confirmed to be trademarks of the order.<ref name=Carboni>{{Citation |last=Carboni |first=Anna |title=In the matter of trade mark applications nos. 2322346A & 2322346B In the name of Ordo Templi Orientis and in the matter of consolidated oppositions nos. 92269 & 92270 thereto by Starfire Publishing Limited |date=2008-06-06 |url=https://www.ipo.gov.uk/tm/t-decisionmaking/t-challenge/t-challenge-decision-results/o15708.pdf |publisher=Intellectual Property Office (UK)}}</ref>