Editing John Searle (section)

==Further reading==
* [https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitio/article/view/21883/18979 The issue of free will in John R. Searle: a contrast of biological naturalism to physicalism and to functionalism] – Cescon, E., & Nunes, D. P. (2015). A questão do livre-arbítrio em John R. Searle: uma contraposição do naturalismo biológico ao fisicalismo e ao funcionalismo. ''Cognitio-Estudos: revista eletrônica de filosofia'', ''12''(2), 179–190.
* [http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/smith_speech_acts.htm Papers on the History of Speech Act Theory by Barry Smith]
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20010221025515/http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/OldArchive/bbs.searle2.html "Minds, Brains and Programs"], ''The Behavioral and Brain Sciences''.3, pp.&nbsp;417–424. (1980)
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20070406071603/http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Py104/searle.comp.html "Is the Brain a Digital Computer?"] (1990) Presidential Address to the American Philosophical Association
* "Collective Intentions and Actions" (1990) in ''Intentions in Communication'' by Philip R. Cohen, Jerry L. Morgan & Martha E. Pollack (eds.). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press: pp.&nbsp;401–416.
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20160604185004/http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/harnad/Papers/Py104/searle.prob.html The Problem of Consciousness], ''Social Research'', Vol. 60, No.1, Spring 1993.
* [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=10845075 Consciousness] Annu. Rev. Neurosci. (2000) 23:557–78. Review.
* [[David Koepsell|D. Koepsell]] (ed.) and L. Moss (ed.) "Searle and Smith: A Dialogue" in ''John Searle's Ideas About Social Reality: Extensions, Criticisms, and Reconstructions'' (2003), Blackwell, {{ISBN|978-1-4051-1258-1}}
* [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18276124?ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum Dualism revisited] ''J Physiol Paris''. 2007 Jul–Nov;101(4–6):169–78. Epub 2008 Jan 19.
* M. Bennett, [[Daniel Dennett|D. Dennett]], [[Peter Hacker|P. Hacker]], J. Searle, ''Neuroscience and Philosophy: Brain, Mind and Language'' (2007), Columbia University Press, {{ISBN|0-231-14044-4}}
* [http://www.ditext.com/searle/searle1.html The Storm Over the University]
* [https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/issue/view/2274 Interview with Léo Peruzzo Júnior].
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20100108051728/http://tobias-lib.ub.uni-tuebingen.de/volltexte/2006/2273/pdf/Dissertation_Doerge.pdf Doerge (2006), Friedrich Christoph: ''Illocutionary Acts—Austin's Account and What Searle Made Out of It''. Tuebingen: Tuebingen University.]
* [http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/organon/prilohy/2012/2/161-169.pdf Koblizek (2012), Tomas: ''How to Make the Concepts Clear: Searle's Discussion with Derrida''. Organon F, Suppl. Issue 2, pp. 157–165. (Searle's reply to Koblizek: ibid., pp. 217–220.)]
* [[Gary Marcus]], "Am I Human?: Researchers need new ways to distinguish [[artificial intelligence]] from the natural kind", ''[[Scientific American]]'', vol. 316, no. 3 (March 2017), pp.&nbsp;58–63. ''Multiple'' tests of artificial-intelligence efficacy are needed because, "just as there is no single test of [[Athletics (physical culture)|athletic]] prowess, there cannot be one ultimate test of [[intelligence]]." One such test, a "Construction Challenge", would test perception and physical action -—"two important elements of intelligent behavior that were entirely absent from the original [[Turing test]]." Another proposal has been to give machines the same standardized tests of science and other disciplines that schoolchildren take. A so far insuperable stumbling block to artificial intelligence is an incapacity for reliable [[disambiguation]]. "[V]irtually every sentence [that people generate] is [[ambiguity|ambiguous]], often in multiple ways." A prominent example is known as the "pronoun disambiguation problem": a machine has no way of determining to whom or what a [[pronoun]] in a sentence—such as "he", "she" or "it"—refers.