Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Eugenics
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Contemporary ethical opposition=== {{See also|Larry Arnhart|Leon Kass|Preimplantation genetic diagnosis#Religious objections}} In a book directly addressed at socialist eugenicist [[J. B. S. Haldane#Social and scientific views|J.B.S. Haldane]] and his once-influential ''[[Daedalus; or, Science and the Future|Daedalus]]'', [[Political views of Bertrand Russell#Eugenics|Betrand Russell]] had one serious objection of his own: eugenic policies might simply end up being used to reproduce existing power relations "rather than to make men happy."<ref>{{cite book|last=Russell|first=Bertrand|author-link=Political views of Bertrand Russell#Eugenics|title=Icarus, or, The future of science|date=1924|publisher= E.P. Dutton & Co.|location=New York|url=https://archive.org/download/icarusorfutureof00russ/icarusorfutureof00russ.pdf|pages=5}}</ref> [[environmental ethics|Environmental ethicist]] [[Bill McKibben]] argued against [[germinal choice technology]] and other advanced biotechnological strategies for human enhancement. He writes that it would be morally wrong for humans to tamper with fundamental aspects of themselves (or their children) in an attempt to overcome universal human limitations, such as vulnerability to [[aging]], [[maximum life span]] and biological constraints on physical and cognitive ability. Attempts to "improve" themselves through such manipulation would remove limitations that provide a necessary context for the experience of meaningful human choice. He claims that human lives would no longer seem [[Meaning of life|meaningful]] in a world where such limitations could be overcome with technology. Even the goal of using germinal choice technology for clearly therapeutic purposes should be relinquished, he argues, since it would inevitably produce temptations to tamper with such things as cognitive capacities. He argues that it is possible for societies to benefit from renouncing particular technologies, using [[Ming dynasty|Ming China]], [[Tokugawa shogunate|Tokugawa Japan]] and the contemporary [[Amish]] as examples.<ref name="McKibben 2003">{{cite book |last=McKibben |first=Bill |author-link=Bill McKibben |title=Enough: Staying Human in an Engineered Age |publisher=Times Books |date=2003 |isbn=9780805070965 |oclc=237794777}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Eugenics
(section)
Add topic