Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
ESPN
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Criticism== {{Main|Criticism of ESPN}} ESPN has been criticized for focusing too much on men's college and professional sports (particularly the NBA and NFL), and very little on women's sports or extreme sports.<ref>{{Cite book|title=The ESPN effect: exploring the worldwide leader in sports|last=Lavelle|first=Katherine L|others=McGuire, John, 1961β, Armfield, Greg G.; Earnheardt, Adam C., 1970β|year=2015|isbn=978-1-4331-2600-0|location=New York|chapter=Chapter 10 The ESPN Effect Representation of Women in 30 for 30 Films|oclc=917889678}}</ref> [[Baseball]], [[ice hockey]], and [[association football|soccer]] fans have also criticized ESPN for not giving their respective sports more coverage.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/hockey/ct-espn-hockey-coverage-stanley-cup-playoffs-20170427-story.html|title=ESPN just gutted its hockey coverage in the middle of the Stanley Cup playoffs|first=Dan|last=Steinberg|newspaper=Chicago Tribune|access-date=April 17, 2020|archive-date=December 3, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201203055736/https://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/hockey/ct-espn-hockey-coverage-stanley-cup-playoffs-20170427-story.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://worldsoccertalk.com/2018/04/10/espn-another-smack-face-soccer-fans/|title=ESPN+ is another smack in the face for soccer fans β World Soccer Talk|date=April 10, 2018|access-date=June 28, 2018|archive-date=June 28, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180628072706/http://worldsoccertalk.com/2018/04/10/espn-another-smack-face-soccer-fans/|url-status=live}}</ref> Other criticism has focused on ethnicity in ESPN's varying mediated forms, as well as carriage fees and issues regarding the exportation of ESPN content.<ref name="afterword">{{cite book |last=Earnheardt |first=Adam C. |editor-last1=McGuire |editor-first1=John |editor-last2=Armfield |editor-first2=Greg |editor-last3=Earnheardt |editor-first3=Adam C. |title=The ESPN Effect: Exploring the Worldwide Leader in Sports |publisher=Peter Lang |date=July 17, 2015 |pages=265β270 |chapter=Chapter 20 Afterword: Challenging the Worldwide Leader in Sports | location = New York | isbn=978-1-4331-2600-0}}</ref> Some critics argue that ESPN's success is their ability to provide other enterprise and investigative sports news while competing with other hard sports-news-producing outlets such as [[Yahoo! Sports]] and [[Fox Sports]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/kurtbadenhausen/2012/11/09/why-espn-is-the-worlds-most-valuable-media-property-and-worth-40-billion/#62fb79856527|title=Why ESPN Is Worth $40 Billion As The World's Most Valuable Media Property|last=Badenhausen|first=Kurt|date=November 9, 2012|website=Forbes|access-date=February 23, 2018|archive-date=February 24, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180224115004/https://www.forbes.com/sites/kurtbadenhausen/2012/11/09/why-espn-is-the-worlds-most-valuable-media-property-and-worth-40-billion/#62fb79856527|url-status=live}}</ref> Some scholars have challenged ESPN's journalistic integrity, calling for an expanded standard of professionalism to prevent biased coverage and conflicts of interest.<ref name="ethics">{{cite journal |last1=Oates |first1=T. P. |last2=Pauly |first2=J. |date=2007 |title=Sports journalism as moral and ethical discourse |journal=Journal of Mass Media Ethics |volume=22 |issue=4 |pages=332β347 |doi=10.1080/08900520701583628 |s2cid=143559022 |url=https://epublications.marquette.edu/comm_fac/172 |access-date=December 28, 2022 |archive-date=January 30, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230130190519/https://epublications.marquette.edu/comm_fac/172/ |url-status=live |issn=0890-0523}}</ref> On October 8, 2019, ''[[Deadspin]]'' reported that an internal memo was sent to ESPN employees instructing them to avoid any political discussions regarding the [[People's Republic of China]] and [[Hong Kong]] in the aftermath of a tweet by [[Houston Rockets]] general manager [[Daryl Morey]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://deadspin.com/internal-memo-espn-forbids-discussion-of-chinese-polit-1838881032|title=Internal Memo: ESPN Forbids Discussion Of Chinese Politics When Discussing Daryl Morey's Tweet About Chinese Politics|website=Deadspin|date=October 8, 2019 |access-date=October 8, 2019|archive-date=October 13, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191013012937/https://deadspin.com/internal-memo-espn-forbids-discussion-of-chinese-polit-1838881032|url-status=live}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
ESPN
(section)
Add topic