Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Condorcet method
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Evaluation by criteria== Scholars of electoral systems often compare them using mathematically defined [[Comparison of electoral systems|voting system criteria]]. The criteria which Condorcet methods satisfy vary from one Condorcet method to another. However, the Condorcet criterion implies the [[Majority favorite criterion|majority criterion]], and thus is incompatible with [[independence of irrelevant alternatives]] (though it implies a weaker analogous form of the criterion: when there is a Condorcet winner, losing candidates can drop out of the election without changing the result),<ref>{{cite arXiv |eprint=1804.02973 |page=351 |quote=The Condorcet criterion for single-winner elections (section 4.7) is important because, when there is a Condorcet winner b ∈ A, then it is still a Condorcet winner when alternatives a1,...,an ∈ A \ {b} are removed. So an alternative b ∈ A doesn’t owe his property of being a Condorcet winner to the presence of some other alternatives. Therefore, when we declare a Condorcet winner b ∈ A elected whenever a Condorcet winner exists, we know that no other alternatives a1,...,an ∈ A \ {b} have changed the result of the election without being elected.|last1=Schulze |first1=Markus |title=The Schulze Method of Voting |year=2018 |class=cs.GT }}</ref> [[later-no-harm]], the [[participation criterion]], and the [[consistency criterion]]. {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center" |- style="font-size:90%;line-height:1;" ! {{diagonal split header|<br />Condorcet<br />method|Voting system<br />criterion}} !! [[Monotonicity criterion|Monotonic]] !! [[Condorcet loser criterion|Condorcet<br />loser]] !! [[Independence of clones criterion|Clone<br />independence]] !! [[Reversal symmetry|Reversal<br />symmetry]] !! [[Polynomial time|Polynomial<br />time]] !! [[Resolvability criterion|Resolvable]] !! [[Independence of irrelevant alternatives#Local independence|Local<br />independence<br />of irrelevant<br />alternatives]] |- ! [[Schulze method|Schulze]] | {{yes}} || {{yes}} || {{yes}} || {{yes}} || {{yes}} || {{yes}} || {{no}} |- ! [[Ranked Pairs]] | {{yes}} || {{yes}} || {{yes}} || {{yes}} || {{yes}} || {{yes}} || {{yes}} |- ! [[Minimax Condorcet|Minimax]] | {{yes}} || {{no}} || {{no}} || {{no}} || {{yes}} || {{yes}} || {{no}} |- ! [[Nanson's method|Nanson]] | {{no}} || {{yes}} || {{no}} || {{yes}} || {{yes}} || {{partial|Unknown}} || {{partial|Unknown}} |- ! [[Kemeny–Young method|Kemeny–Young]] | {{yes}} || {{yes}} || {{no}} || {{yes}} || {{no}} || {{yes}} || {{yes}} |- ! [[Dodgson's method|Dodgson]] | {{no}} || {{no}} || {{no}} || {{no}} || {{no}} || {{partial|Unknown}} || {{partial|Unknown}} |- ! [[Copeland's method|Copeland]] | {{yes}} || {{yes}} || {{no}} || {{yes}} || {{yes}} || {{no}} || {{no}} |}
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Condorcet method
(section)
Add topic