Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Casablanca (film)
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Colorization == [[File:Casablanca (colorized).jpg|right|thumb|alt=Two color film screenshots, one stacked on top of the other. The top image shows a man and woman in a car, the man driving. The bottom screenshot has two men, one watching as the other drinks from a glass.|[[Film still|Stills]] from the controversial [[colorized]] version]] ''Casablanca'' was part of the [[film colorization]] controversy of the 1980s,<ref>{{Cite magazine |last=Krauthammer |first=Charles |author-link=Charles Krauthammer |date=January 12, 1987 |title=Casablanca in Color? |url=https://time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,963207,00.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071106004115/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0%2C9171%2C963207%2C00.html |archive-date=November 6, 2007 |access-date=August 6, 2007 |magazine=Time}}</ref> when a colorized version aired on the television network [[TBS (American TV channel)|WTBS]]. In 1984, [[Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer|MGM/UA]] hired Color Systems Technology to colorize the film for $180,000. When [[Ted Turner]] of [[Turner Broadcasting System]] purchased MGM/UA's film library two years later, he canceled the request, before contracting American Film Technologies (AFT) in 1988. AFT completed the colorization in two months at a cost of $450,000. Turner later reacted to criticism of the colorization, saying, "[''Casablanca''] is one of a handful of films that really doesn't have to be colorized. I did it because I wanted to. All I'm trying to do is protect my investment."<ref name="EdgertonCasa">{{Cite journal |last=Edgerton |first=Gary R. |date=Winter 2000 |title='The Germans Wore Gray, You Wore Blue': Frank Capra, ''Casablanca'', and the Colorization Controversy of the 1980s |journal=[[Journal of Popular Film & Television]] |volume=27 |issue=4 |page=24 |doi=10.1080/01956050009602812 |s2cid=159900256}}</ref> The [[Library of Congress]] deemed that the color change differed so much from the original film that it gave a new copyright to Turner Entertainment. When the colorized film debuted on WTBS, it was watched by three million viewers, not making the top-ten viewed cable shows for the week. Although Jack Matthews of the ''Los Angeles Times'' called the finished product "state of the art", it was mostly met with negative critical reception. It was briefly available on home video. Gary Edgerton, writing for the ''[[Journal of Popular Film & Television]]'' criticized the colorization, stating that "''Casablanca'' in color ended up being much blander in appearance and, overall, much less visually interesting than its 1942 predecessor."<ref name="EdgertonCasa" /> Bogart's son, Stephen, said, "if you're going to colorize ''Casablanca'', why not put arms on the [[Venus de Milo]]?"<ref name="harmetz342" />
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Casablanca (film)
(section)
Add topic