Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Anti-ballistic missile
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===United States=== {{See also|Safeguard Program|Ground-Based Interceptor#Next generation interceptor (NGI)|label2=Next generation interceptor}} [[File:Standard Missile III SM-3 RIM-161 test launch 04017005.jpg|thumb|right|200px|United States Navy [[RIM-161 Standard Missile 3]] anti-ballistic missile.]] In several tests, the U.S. military have demonstrated the feasibility of destroying long and short range ballistic missiles.<ref name = usaSmdc2019 >{{cite web| url = https://www.army.mil/article/225470/leader_gives_space_and_missile_defense_update_at_smd_symposium| title = Jason Cutshaw (August 8, 2019) Leader gives space and missile defense update at SMD Symposium}}</ref> Combat effectiveness of newer systems against 1950s tactical ballistic missiles seems very high, as the [[MIM-104 Patriot]] (PAC-1 and PAC-2) had a 100% success rate in Operation Iraqi Freedom.<ref>{{cite web |author=John Pike |url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/ops/oif-patriot.htm |title=''Operation Iraqi Freedom β Patriot'' |publisher=GlobalSecurity.org |access-date=11 May 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120220031217/http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/ops/oif-patriot.htm |archive-date=20 February 2012 |url-status=live }}</ref> The U.S. Navy [[Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense System]] (Aegis BMD) uses [[RIM-161 Standard Missile 3]], which hit a target going faster than ICBM warheads.<ref name = antiSat >{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7254540.stm|title=BBC NEWS β World β Americas β US missile hits 'toxic satellite'|website=news.bbc.co.uk|date=21 February 2008|access-date=21 July 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090413122801/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7254540.stm|archive-date=13 April 2009|url-status=live}}</ref> On 16 November 2020 an SM-3 Block IIA interceptor successfully destroyed an ICBM in mid-course, under [[Link-16]] Command and Control, Battle Management, and Communications ([[C2BMC]]).<ref name= ftm,44 >[https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/2417334/us-successfully-conducts-sm-3-block-iia-intercept-test-against-an-intercontinen/ MDA Newsroom (17 Nov 2020) U.S. Successfully Conducts SM-3 Block IIA Intercept Test Against an Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Target] SM-3 Block IIA Intercept Test animation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUDQrLcY5oI {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210425000520/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUDQrLcY5oI |date=25 April 2021 }}</ref> The U.S. Army [[Terminal High Altitude Area Defense]] (THAAD) system began production in 2008.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Panda|first1=Ankit|title=What Is THAAD, What Does It Do, and Why Is China Mad About It?|url=https://thediplomat.com/2016/02/what-is-thaad-what-does-it-do-and-why-is-china-mad-about-it/|website=The Diplomat|access-date=3 April 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170404130539/https://thediplomat.com/2016/02/what-is-thaad-what-does-it-do-and-why-is-china-mad-about-it/|archive-date=4 April 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> Its stated range as a short to intermediate ballistic missile interceptor means that it is not designed to hit midcourse ICBMs, which can reach [[Intercontinental ballistic missile#Flight phases|terminal phase]] speeds of [[mach number|mach 8]] or greater. The THAAD interceptor has a reported maximum speed of mach 8, and THAAD has repeatedly proven it can intercept descending exoatmospheric missiles in a ballistic trajectory.<ref>{{Cite web |last=McCarthy |first=Niall |title=Can The U.S. Intercept A North Korean Missile? [Infographic] |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2017/09/05/can-the-u-s-intercept-a-north-korean-missile-infographic/ |access-date=2023-05-17 |website=Forbes |language=en}}</ref> The U.S. Army [[Ground-Based Midcourse Defense]] (GMD) system was developed by the [[Missile Defense Agency]]. It combines ground-based [[AN/FPS-132 Upgraded Early Warning Radar]] installations and mobile [[AN/TPY-2]] X-band radars with 44 exoatmospheric interceptors stationed in underground silos around California and Alaska, to protect against low-count ICBM attacks from rogue states. Each [[Ground-Based Interceptor]] (GBI) rocket carries an [[Exoatmospheric Kill Vehicle]] (EKV) kinetic kill interceptor, with 97% probability of intercept when four interceptors are launched at the target. Since 2004, the [[United States Army]] plans to replace [[Raytheon]]'s Patriot missile (SAM) engagement control station (ECS), along with seven other forms of ABM defense command systems, with [[United States Army Futures Command#Integrated Air and Missile Defense Battle Command System|Integrated Air and Missile Defense Battle Command System]] (IBCS) designed to shoot down short, medium, and intermediate range ballistic missiles in their terminal phase by intercepting with a hit-to-kill approach.<ref name = ibcs2004 >{{cite web|title=Army Seeks To Field One-Size-Fits-All Battle Command System|url=http://spacenews.com/army-seeks-field-one-size-fits-all-battle-command-system/|publisher=Space News|date=29 June 2004}}</ref><ref name = history >{{cite web|last1= Kiley|first1= Gregory T.|title= Congress and the Administration Must Reassess Failing Missile Defense Programs|url= http://www.realcleardefense.com/articles/2017/05/17/failing_missile_defense_programs_111398.html|publisher= RealClearDefense|date= 17 May 2017|access-date= 22 June 2017|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20170521151129/http://www.realcleardefense.com/articles/2017/05/17/failing_missile_defense_programs_111398.html|archive-date= 21 May 2017|url-status= live}}</ref><ref name = 14e >{{cite web| url = https://www.army.mil/article/225475/mos_14e_linchpin_of_patriot_missile_system| title = Fort Sill Tribune staff (August 8, 2019) MOS 14E: Linchpin of Patriot missile system}}</ref><ref name = ibcsPatriotThaad >{{cite web| url = https://www.defensenews.com/digital-show-dailies/ausa/2018/10/10/so-patriot-and-thaad-will-talk-what-does-that-really-mean/| title = Jen Judson (11 Oct 2018) So Patriot and THAAD will talk. What does that really mean?| date = 10 October 2018}}</ref> Northrop Grumman was selected as the prime contractor in 2010; the Army spent $2.7 billion on the program between 2009 and 2020.<ref name= pac2Pac3Intercepts >{{cite web| url = https://www.defensenews.com/digital-show-dailies/smd/2020/08/20/armys-future-missile-defense-battle-command-system-caps-off-major-test-with-defeat-of-cruise-ballistic-missile-threats/| title = Jen Judson (20 Aug 2020) US Army's future missile defense command system nearly simultaneously defeats cruise, ballistic missile threats| date = 20 August 2020}}</ref> IBCS engagement stations will support identification and tracking of targets using sensor fusion from disparate data streams, and selection of appropriate kill vehicles from available launcher systems.<ref name = ibcsNorthrup >[http://www.northropgrumman.com/Capabilities/IBCS/Pages/default.aspx Integrated Air and Missile Defense Battle Command System (IBCS)]{{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171006163751/http://www.northropgrumman.com/Capabilities/IBCS/Pages/default.aspx |date=6 October 2017 }} vendor summary</ref><ref name=ibcsAward >{{cite web| url = https://www.defensenews.com/land/2018/10/02/army-continues-push-for-integrated-sensors-and-shooters-with-latest-ibcs-contract/| title = Daniel Cebul (12 October 2018) Army continues push for integrated sensors and shooters with latest IBCS contract| date = 2 October 2018}}</ref><ref name = "ibcs, thaad, lrpf" >[https://www.defensenews.com/digital-show-dailies/ausa/2018/10/08/army-looks-to-a-future-of-integrated-fire/ Daniel Cebul β(9 October 2018) Army looks to a future of integrated fire ] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221126000941/https://www.defensenews.com/digital-show-dailies/ausa/2018/10/08/army-looks-to-a-future-of-integrated-fire/ |date=26 November 2022 }} by integrating THAAD IBCS LRPF</ref><ref>Andrew Eversden [https://breakingdefense.com/2021/12/army-awards-northrop-grumman-1-4-billion-contract-for-ibcs/ (23 Dec 2021) Army awards Northrop Grumman $1.4 billion contract for IBCS] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211224073613/https://breakingdefense.com/2021/12/army-awards-northrop-grumman-1-4-billion-contract-for-ibcs/ |date=24 December 2021 }}</ref><ref name= fallsBehind >{{cite web| url = https://www.defensenews.com/land/2017/02/06/army-falls-behind-with-new-anti-missile-command-system/| title = Jen Judson (February 6, 2017) Army falls behind with new anti-missile command system| date = 6 February 2017}}</ref> In February 2022 THAAD radar and TFCC (THAAD Fire Control & Communication) demonstrated their interoperability with Patriot PAC-3 MSE missile launchers, engaging targets using both THAAD and Patriot interceptors.<ref name= ibcsProofOfConcept >Jen Judson [https://www.defensenews.com/pentagon/2022/03/10/missile-defense-agency-fires-patriot-missile-from-thaad-system/ (10 Mar 2022) Missile Defense Agency fires Patriot missile from THAAD system] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221126000939/https://www.defensenews.com/pentagon/2022/03/10/missile-defense-agency-fires-patriot-missile-from-thaad-system/ |date=26 November 2022 }}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Anti-ballistic missile
(section)
Add topic