Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Type theory
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Research areas=== ==== Category theory ==== Although the initial motivation for [[category theory]] was far removed from foundationalism, the two fields turned out to have deep connections. As [[John Lane Bell]] writes: "In fact categories can ''themselves'' be viewed as type theories of a certain kind; this fact alone indicates that type theory is much more closely related to category theory than it is to set theory." In brief, a category can be viewed as a type theory by regarding its objects as types (or ''sorts'' <ref>{{Cite journal|last=Barendregt|first=Henk|date=1991|title=Introduction to generalized type systems|journal=[[Journal of Functional Programming]]|volume=1|issue=2|pages=125–154|doi=10.1017/s0956796800020025|issn=0956-7968|hdl=2066/17240|s2cid=44757552 |hdl-access=free}}</ref>), i.e. "Roughly speaking, a category may be thought of as a type theory shorn of its syntax." A number of significant results follow in this way:<ref name="Sets and Extensions in the Twentieth Century">{{cite book|series=Handbook of the History of Logic|volume=6|title=Sets and Extensions in the Twentieth Century|year=2012|publisher=Elsevier|isbn=978-0-08-093066-4|first=John L.|last=Bell|chapter=Types, Sets and Categories|chapter-url=http://publish.uwo.ca/~jbell/types.pdf|editor-first=Akihiro|editor-last=Kanamory|access-date=2012-11-03|archive-date=2018-04-17|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180417105624/http://publish.uwo.ca/~jbell/types.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> * [[Cartesian closed category|cartesian closed categories]] correspond to the typed λ-calculus ([[Lambek]], 1970); * [[C-monoid]]s (categories with products and exponentials and one non-terminal object) correspond to the untyped λ-calculus (observed independently by Lambek and [[Dana Scott]] around 1980); * [[Locally cartesian closed category|locally cartesian closed categories]] correspond to [[Martin-Löf type theory|Martin-Löf type theories]] (Seely, 1984). The interplay, known as [[categorical logic]], has been a subject of active research since then; see the monograph of Jacobs (1999) for instance. ==== Homotopy type theory ==== [[Homotopy type theory]] attempts to combine type theory and category theory. It focuses on equalities, especially equalities between types. [[Homotopy type theory]] differs from [[intuitionistic type theory]] mostly by its handling of the equality type. In 2016, [[cubical type theory]] was proposed, which is a homotopy type theory with normalization.<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Sterling |first1=Jonathan |title=2021 36th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS) |last2=Angiuli |first2=Carlo |date=2021-06-29 |publisher=IEEE |isbn=978-1-6654-4895-6 |location=Rome, Italy |pages=1–15 |chapter=Normalization for Cubical Type Theory |doi=10.1109/LICS52264.2021.9470719 |access-date=2022-06-21 |chapter-url=https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9470719 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230813170127/https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9470719 |archive-date=2023-08-13 |url-status=live |arxiv=2101.11479 |s2cid=231719089}}</ref><ref name=":0" />
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Type theory
(section)
Add topic