Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Substance theory
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Christianity=== The Christian writers of antiquity adhered to the Aristotelian conception of substance. Their peculiarity was the use of this idea for the discernment of theological nuances. [[Clement of Alexandria]] considered both material and spiritual substances: blood and milk; mind and soul, respectively.<ref>Clemens Alexandrinus, ''Stromata'', VIII, 6; IV, 32; VI, 6</ref> [[Origen]] may be the first theologian expressing Christ's similarity with the Father as [[consubstantiality]]. [[Tertullian]] professed the same view in the West.<ref>Tertulianus adversus Marcionem, lib. IV, 9, 7.</ref> The ecclesiastics of the Cappadocian group ([[Basil of Caesarea]], [[Gregory of Nazianzus]], [[Gregory of Nyssa]]) taught that the [[Trinity]] had a single substance in three hypostases individualized by the relations among them. In later ages, the meaning of "substance" became more important because of the dogma of the [[Eucharist]]. [[Hildebert|Hildebert of Lavardin]], [[archbishop of Tours]], introduced the term ''[[transubstantiation]]'' about 1080; its use spread after the [[Fourth Council of the Lateran]] in 1215. According to [[Thomas Aquinas]], beings may possess substance in three different modes. Together with other Medieval philosophers, he interpreted God's epithet "[[El Shaddai]]" ([[Genesis 17]]:1) as self-sufficient and concluded that God's essence was identical with existence.<ref name="AquinasV">{{cite book |author=Thomas Aquinas |title=De ente et essentia |chapter=V |translator=Robert T. Miller | year=1997 |chapter-url=https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/basis/aquinas-esse.asp|author-link=Thomas Aquinas }}</ref> Aquinas also deemed the substance of spiritual creatures identical with their essence (or form); therefore he considered each [[angel]] to belong to its own distinct species.{{citation needed|date=January 2020}} In Aquinas' view, composite substances consist of form and matter. Human substantial form, i.e. soul, receives its individuality from body.<ref>Thomas Aquinas, ''De ente et essentia'', VI; ''[[Summa Theologica]]'', q.29, a.1</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Substance theory
(section)
Add topic