Editing Seleucid Empire (section)

===Agriculture===
{{Main|Seleucid agriculture}}
Agriculture, like most pre-modern economies, constituted a vast majority of the Seleucid economy. Somewhere between 80 and 90% of the Seleucid population was employed,<ref name=":0" /> in some form, within the prevailing agricultural structures inherited from their Neo-Babylonian and Achaemenid predecessors.<ref name=":2" /> These included temples, {{Transliteration|grc|poleis}}, and royal estates. We should clarify that the term {{Transliteration|grc|poleis}}, according to Spek, did not confer any special status to cities in the Seleucid sources; it was simply the term for "city"—Greek or otherwise.<ref name=":0" /> Regardless, agricultural produce varied from region to region. But in general, Greek {{Transliteration|grc|poleis}} produced: "grain, olives and their oil, wine...figs, cheese from sheep and goats, [and] meat."<ref name=":2" /> Whereas Mesopotamian production from temple land consisted of: "barley, dates, mustard (or cascuta/dodder), cress (cardamom), sesame and wool"; which, as the core region of the Seleucid empire, was also the most productive.<ref name=":3" /><ref name=":0" />
Recent evidence indicates that Mesopotamian grain production, under the Seleucids, was subject to market forces of supply and demand.<ref name=":3" /> Traditional "primitivist" narratives of the ancient economy argue that it was "marketless"; however, the Babylonian astronomical diaries show a high degree of market integration of barley and date prices—to name a few—in Seleucid Babylonia.<ref name=":4" /> Prices exceeding ''370g'' silver per ton in Seleucid Mesopotamia was considered a sign of famine. Therefore, during periods of war, heavy taxation, and crop failure, prices increase drastically. In an extreme example, Spek believes tribal Arab raiding into Babylonia caused barley prices to skyrocket to 1493 grams of silver per ton from 5–8 May, 124 BC.<ref name=":4" /> The average Mesopotamian peasant, if working for a wage at a temple, would receive 1 shekel; it "was a reasonable monthly wage for which one could buy one kor of grain= 180 [liters]."<ref name=":4" /> While this appears dire, we should be reminded that Mesopotamia under the Seleucids was largely stable and prices remained low.<ref name=":3" /> With encouraged Greek colonization and land reclamation increasing the supply of grain production, however, the question of whether this artificially kept prices stable is uncertain.<ref name=":3" />

The Seleucids also continued the tradition of actively maintaining the Mesopotamian waterways. As the greatest source of state income, the Seleucid kings actively managed the irrigation, reclamation, and population of Mesopotamia.<ref name=":3" /> In fact, canals were often dug by royal decrees, to which "some were called the King's Canal for that reason."<ref name=":0" /> For example, the construction of the [[Fallujah#Early history and middle ages|Pallacottas canal]] was able to control the water level of the Euphrates which, as [[Arrian]] notes in his [[Anabasis of Alexander|Anabasis]] 7.21.5, required: "over two months of work by more than 10,000 Assyrians."<ref name=":0" />